Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hemorrhagic Shearing Lesions in Children and Adolescents with Posttraumatic Diffuse Axonal Injury: Improved Detection and Initial Results

Tong, Karen A., Ashwal, Stephen, Holshouser, Barbara A., Shutter, Lori A., Herigault, Gwenael, Haacke, E. Mark, Kido, Daniel K.·2003·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of a high-spatial-resolution susceptibility-weighted (SW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique with that of a conventional gradient-recalled-echo (GRE) MR imaging technique for detection of hemorrhage in children and adolescents with diffuse axonal injury (DAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven young patients with a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score of 7 +/- 4 (SD) at admission were imaged a mean of 5 days +/- 3 after injury. High-spatial-resolution three-dimensional GRE imaging performed with postprocessing by using a normalized phase mask was compared with conventional GRE MR imaging. The total and mean values of lesion number and apparent hemorrhage volume load determined with both examinations were compared. Mean values were compared by using paired t test analysis. Differences were considered to be significant at P < or =.05. RESULTS: Hemorrhagic lesions were much more visible on SW MR images than on conventional GRE MR images. SW MR imaging depicted 1,038 hemorrhagic DAI lesions with an apparent total hemorrhage volume of 57,946 mm3. GRE MR imaging depicted 162 lesions with an apparent total hemorrhage volume of 28,893 mm3. SW MR imaging depicted a significantly higher mean number of lesions in all patients than did GRE MR imaging, according to results of visual (P =.004) and computer (P =.004) counting analyses. The mean hemorrhage volume load for all patients also was significantly greater (P =.014) by using SW MR imaging according to computer analysis. SW MR imaging appeared to depict much smaller hemorrhagic lesions than GRE MR imaging. The majority (59%) of individual hemorrhagic DAI lesions seen on SW MR images were small in area (<10 mm(2)), whereas the majority (43%) of lesions seen on GRE images were larger in area (10-20 mm(2)). CONCLUSION: SW MR imaging depicts significantly more small hemorrhagic lesions than does conventional GRE MR imaging and therefore has the potential to improve diagnosis of DAI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2272020176

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Tong, K. A., Ashwal, S., Holshouser, B. A., Shutter, L. A., Herigault, G., Haacke, E. M., & Kido, D. K.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2003-05
Volume
227
Issue
2
Pages
332-339
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W1989394653
Cited by
429
References
0
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemorrhagic Shearing Lesions in Children and Adolescents with Posttraumatic Diffuse Axonal Injury: Improved Detection and Initial Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2272020176
The paper
Tong, K. A., Ashwal, S., Holshouser, B. A., Shutter, L. A., Herigault, G., Haacke, E. M., & Kido, D. K. (2003). Hemorrhagic Shearing Lesions in Children and Adolescents with Posttraumatic Diffuse Axonal Injury: Improved Detection and Initial Results. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2272020176

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.