The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate Differentiation of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia from Hepatic Adenoma at Gadobenate Dimeglumine–enhanced MR Imaging: Prospective Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of differentiating benign focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatic adenoma (HA) and liver adenomatosis (LA) by using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ethics committee at each center approved the study, and all patients provided informed consent. Seventy-three patients with confirmed FNH and 35 patients with confirmed HA (n = 27) or LA (n = 8) underwent MR imaging before (T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement or T2-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted gradient-echo [GRE] sequences) and at 25-30 seconds (arterial phase), 70-90 seconds (portal venous phase), 3-5 minutes (equilibrium phase), and 1-3 hours (delayed phase) after (T1-weighted GRE sequences only, with or without fat suppression) bolus administration of 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight gadobenate dimeglumine. The enhancement of 235 lesions (128 FNH, 32 HA, and 75 LA lesions) relative to the normal liver parenchyma was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy for the differentiation of FNH from HA and LA were determined. RESULTS: Hyper- and isointensity on T2-weighted and iso- and hypointensity on T1-weighted GRE images were noted for 177 (88.9%) of 199 lesions visible on unenhanced images. On dynamic phase images after contrast material administration, 231 (98.3%) of 235 lesions showed rapid strong enhancement during the arterial phase and appeared hyper- to isointense during portal venous and equilibrium phases. Accurate differentiation of FNH from HA and LA was not possible on the basis of precontrast or dynamic phase images alone. At 1-3 hours after contrast material enhancement, 124 (96.9%) of 128 FNHs appeared hyper- or isointense, while 107 (100%) HA and LA lesions appeared hypointense. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy for the differentiation of FNH from HA and LA were 96.9%, 100%, 100%, 96.4%, and 98.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Accurate differentiation of FNH from HA and LA is achievable on delayed T1-weighted GRE images after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Pathogenesis of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia of the Liver
Wanless, I. R., Mawdsley, C., & Adams, R. (1985) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840050622 · Cited by 625
Nguyen, B. N., Fléjou, J.-F., Terris, B., Belghiti, J., & Degott, C. (1999) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-199912000-00001 · Cited by 467
Semelka, R. C., Brown, E. D., Ascher, S. M., Patt, R. H., Bagley, A. S., Li, W., Edelman, R. R., Shoenut, J. P., & Brown, J. J. (1994) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.192.2.8029404 · Cited by 309
CT and MR Imaging of Benign Hepatic and Biliary Tumors
Horton, K. M., Bluemke, D. A., Hruban, R. H., Soyer, P., & Fishman, E. K. (1999) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr04431 · Cited by 284
Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of MR imaging and histopathologic findings.
Kadoya, M., Matsui, O., Takashima, T., & Nonomura, A. (1992) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.183.3.1316622 · Cited by 280
Semelka, R. C., Martin, D. R., Balci, C., & Lance, T. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1057 · Cited by 274
Liver Cell Adenomas: A 12-Year Surgical Experience From a Specialist Hepato-Biliary Unit
LEESE, T., FAROES, O., & BISMUTH, H. (1988) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198811000-00003 · Cited by 245
Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA): An Overview
KIRCHIN, M. A., PIROVANO, G. P., & SPINAZZI, A. (1998) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/00004424-199811000-00003 · Cited by 218
Self-citationSpinazzi, A., Lorusso, V., Pirovano, G., & Kirchin, M. (1999) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(99)80451-6 · Cited by 204
Self-citationSpectrum of MRI Appearances of Untreated Metastases of the Liver
Danet, I.-M., Semelka, R. C., Leonardou, P., Braga, L., Vaidean, G., Woosley, J. T., & Kanematsu, M. (2003) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810809 · Cited by 193
Cited by
ACG Clinical Guideline: The Diagnosis and Management of Focal Liver Lesions
Marrero, J. A., Ahn, J., & Reddy, R. K. (2014) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.213 · Cited by 477
Hepatobiliary-specific MR Contrast Agents: Role in Imaging the Liver and Biliary Tree
Seale, M. K., Catalano, O. A., Saini, S., Hahn, P. F., & Sahani, D. V. (2009) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.296095515 · Cited by 388
Ringe, K. I., Husarik, D. B., Sirlin, C. B., & Merkle, E. M. (2010) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.10.4392 · Cited by 388
Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging
Thian, Y. L., Riddell, A. M., & Koh, D.-M. (2013) · Cancer Imaging · doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0050 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Grazioli, L., Morana, G., Kirchin, M. A., & Schneider, G.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 236
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 166-177
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2004067055
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate Differentiation of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia from Hepatic Adenoma at Gadobenate Dimeglumine–enhanced MR Imaging: Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2361040338
- The paper
- Grazioli, L., Morana, G., Kirchin, M. A., & Schneider, G. (2005). Accurate Differentiation of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia from Hepatic Adenoma at Gadobenate Dimeglumine–enhanced MR Imaging: Prospective Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2361040338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.