Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatic Lesion Detection and Characterization: Value of Nonenhanced MR Imaging, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging, and Spiral CT—ROC Analysis

Reimer, Peter, Jähnke, Nicole, Fiebich, Martin, Schima, Wolfgang, Deckers, Filip, Marx, Christian, Holzknecht, Nicolaus, Saini, Sanjay·2000·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy for detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions of nonenhanced, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced, or a combination of nonenhanced and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT and T2-weighted SPIO-enhanced (ferucarbotran-enhanced) MR imaging were performed in 35 patients within 2 weeks before surgery for malignant hepatic lesions. Only malignant lesions with histopathologic proof were considered. A total of 875 images with and 800 images without focal lesions were presented to five readers, who were asked to assess the presence and characterization of lesions by using a five-point confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Nonenhanced and SPIO-enhanced images together and SPIO-enhanced images alone yielded the best performance for lesion detection. No differences were found among all imaging techniques with regard to lesion characterization (benign vs malignant). The combined approach resulted in larger area under the ROC curve (A(z) = 0.9062) and accuracy (85.3%) (P < 0.02), as compared with SPIO-enhanced MR imaging (A(z) = 0.8667; accuracy, 73.1%). CONCLUSION: SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging was more accurate than nonenhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging and contrast-enhanced spiral CT for the detection of focal hepatic lesions. The combined analysis of nonenhanced and SPIO-enhanced images was more accurate in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions than was review of SPIO-enhanced images alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc31152

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Reimer, P., Jähnke, N., Fiebich, M., Schima, W., Deckers, F., Marx, C., Holzknecht, N., & Saini, S.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2000-10
Volume
217
Issue
1
Pages
152-158
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2161859610
Cited by
188
References
2
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic Lesion Detection and Characterization: Value of Nonenhanced MR Imaging, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging, and Spiral CT—ROC Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc31152
The paper
Reimer, P., Jähnke, N., Fiebich, M., Schima, W., Deckers, F., Marx, C., Holzknecht, N., & Saini, S. (2000). Hepatic Lesion Detection and Characterization: Value of Nonenhanced MR Imaging, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging, and Spiral CT—ROC Analysis. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc31152

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.