Cited by 341Maternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesUterine Myomas and Treatments

Placenta Accreta: Spectrum of US and MR Imaging Findings

Baughman, W. Christopher, Corteville, Jane E., Shah, Rajiv R.·2008·RadioGraphics

Abstract

Placenta accreta (PA) encompasses various types of abnormal placentation in which chorionic villi attach directly to or invade the myometrium. PA is a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality and is now the most common reason for emergent postpartum hysterectomy. Its prevalence has risen tenfold in the United States over the past 50 years, primarily due to the increasing percentage of pregnant patients undergoing primary and repeat cesarean sections. Placenta previa and previous cesarean section are the two most important known risk factors for PA. Accurate prenatal identification of affected pregnancies allows optimal obstetric management. Ultrasonography (US) remains the diagnostic standard, and routine US examination at 18-20 weeks gestation affords an ideal opportunity to screen for the disorder. Placental lacunae and abnormal color Doppler imaging patterns are the most helpful US markers for PA. In recent years, there has been increased interest in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the evaluation of PA, since it can provide information on depth of invasion and more clearly depict posterior placentas. The most reliable MR imaging findings are uterine bulging, heterogeneous placenta, and placental bands. Focal interruptions in the hypointense myometrial border may also be helpful. PA is a clinical and diagnostic challenge that is being encountered with increasing frequency. Clinicians should be aware of the clinical issues, risk factors, and imaging findings…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/rg.287085060

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baughman, W. C., Corteville, J. E., & Shah, R. R.
Affiliations
MetroHealth Medical Center (US)
Venue
RadioGraphics
Published
2008-11
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
1905-1916
ISSN
  • 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1323
OpenAlex
W2116740233
Cited by
341
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiographics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
placenta accreta, placenta accreta spectrum, abnormal placentation, prenatal diagnosis, placental lacunae, color Doppler ultrasound, MRI findings, placenta previa, previous cesarean section, maternal morbidity, postpartum hysterectomy, risk factors
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review