Cited by 173Maternal and fetal healthcareUterine Myomas and TreatmentsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) joint consensus statement for MR imaging of placenta accreta spectrum disorders

Jha, Priyanka, Pōder, Liina, Bourgioti, Charis, Bharwani, Nishat, Lewis, Sara, Kamath, Amita, Nougaret, Stephanie, Soyer, Philippe +5 more·2020·European Radiology

Abstract

Objectives This study was conducted in order to establish the joint Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders and propose strategies to standardize image acquisition, interpretation, and reporting for this condition with MRI.Methods The published evidence-based data and the opinion of experts were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and formed the basis for these consensus guidelines. The responses of the experts to questions regarding the details of patient preparation, MRI protocol, image interpretation, and reporting were collected, analyzed, and classified as "recommended" versus "not recommended" (if at least 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if less than 80% consensus among experts).Results Consensus regarding image acquisition, interpretation, and reporting was determined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. The use of a tailored MRI protocol and standardized report was recommended.Conclusions A standardized imaging protocol and reporting system ensures recognition of the salient features of PAS disorders. These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for the evaluation of PAS disorders with MRI.Key points • MRI is a powerful adjunct to ultrasound and provides valuable information on the topography and depth of placental invasion. • Consensus statement proposed a common lexicon to allow for uniformity in MRI acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of PAS disorders. • Seven MRI features, namely intraplacental dark T2 bands, uterine/placental bulge, loss of low T2 retroplacental line, myometrial thinning/disruption, bladder wall interruption, focal exophytic placental mass, and abnormal vasculature of the placental bed, reached consensus and are categorized as "recommended" for diagnosing PAS disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-019-06617-7

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasound and MRI are the imaging modalities of choice for diagnosing PAS antenatally.

    “Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the imaging modalities of choice for diagnosing PAS antenatally [5, 6].”
  • MRI plays an important role in PAS, such as for surgical planning and in the assessment of posterior or lateral defects.

    “MRI plays an important role, such as for surgical planning and in the assessment of posterior or lateral defects [5, 7, 8].”
  • Well-described MR imaging features such as abnormal vascularisation of the placental bed and focal exophytic mass are signs of severe PAS and are usually seen at the level of the bladder, thus included in the inferior placental ROI.

    “Well-described MR imaging features, such as abnormal vascularisation of the placental bed and focal exophytic mass, are signs of severe PAS; they are usually seen at the level of the bladder, and are therefore included in the inferior placental ROI [5].”
  • There was consensus that delineating the myometrium would have limited accuracy because it is often thinned to less than 1 mm or not visible.

    “there was consensus that there would be limited accuracy in delineating the myometrium which in many cases will be thinned to less than 1 mm or not be visible [5]”
  • Ultrasound and MRI both rely heavily on reader expertise of the clinician.

    “Ultrasound and MRI both rely heavily on reader expertise of the clinician [5, 10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jha, P., Pōder, L., Bourgioti, C., Bharwani, N., Lewis, S., Kamath, A., Nougaret, S., Soyer, P., Weston, M., Castillo, R. P., Kido, A., Forstner, R., & Masselli, G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
  • Policlinico Umberto I (IT)
Corresponding author
Jha, Priyanka
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2020-02-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
2604-2615
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W3006094000
Cited by
173
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
21.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
placenta accreta spectrum, magnetic resonance imaging, placental invasion, standardized imaging protocol, image reporting, myometrial thinning, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Placenta, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Radiography, Abdominal, Radiology, Societies, Medical, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review