Cited by 219Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Findings of Pelvic Endometriosis at Transvaginal US, MR Imaging, and Laparoscopy

Chamié, Luciana Pardini, Blasbalg, Roberto, Pereira, Ricardo Mendes Alves, Warmbrand, Gisele, Serafini, Paulo Cesar·2011·RadioGraphics

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common multifocal gynecologic disease that manifests during the reproductive years, often causing chronic pelvic pain and infertility. It may occur as invasive peritoneal fibrotic nodules and adhesions or as ovarian cysts with hemorrhagic content. Although findings at physical examination may be suggestive, imaging is necessary for definitive diagnosis, patient counseling, and treatment planning. The imaging techniques that are most useful for preoperative disease mapping are transvaginal ultrasonography (US) after bowel preparation, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Initial transvaginal US is a reliable technique for detecting rectosigmoid endometriotic lesions. MR imaging is indicated as a complementary examination in complex cases of endometriosis with extensive adhesions and ureteral involvement. Peritoneal endometriotic implants are typically hypoechoic on transvaginal US images and demonstrate low signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. Endometriotic implants most commonly are found in retrocervical and rectosigmoid sites, followed by the vagina, bladder, and ureters. Cysts with low-level internal echoes and echogenic peripheral foci at transvaginal US are suggestive of endometriomas. MR imaging has high specificity for identifying endometriomas, which are characterized by high signal intensity on T1-weighted images and low signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Correlation of the radiologic imaging features of endometriotic lesions with their laparoscopic appearances may help improve individual proficiency in the radiologic diagnosis of endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/rg.314105193

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chamié, L. P., Blasbalg, R., Pereira, R. M. A., Warmbrand, G., & Serafini, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Fleury S.A. (Brazil) (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
RadioGraphics
Published
2011-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
E77-E100
ISSN
  • 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1323
OpenAlex
W2109580987
Cited by
219
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiographics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
pelvic endometriosis, transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, laparoscopy, endometrioma, rectosigmoid endometriosis, bowel preparation, adhesion, ureteral involvement, radiographic diagnosis, T2-weighted signal intensity
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pelvis, Laparoscopy, Ultrasonography, Vagina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review