Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Degradation Study of MEA for PEMFCs under Low Humidity Conditions

Open access
Endoh, Eiji, Terazono, Shinji, Widjaja, Hardiyanto, Takimoto, Yasuyuki·2004·Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters

Abstract

The degradation study of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) for proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) under low humidity conditions was conducted. The MEA degradation was observed during low humidity open-circuit voltage tests. To investigate the degradation mechanism, we conducted electron spin resonance studies of the degenerated MEA, and confirmed the formation of radicals in the catalyst layers. The MEA degradation mechanism that includes the radical formation reaction was verified. © 2004 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.1739314

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Endoh, E., Terazono, S., Widjaja, H., & Takimoto, Y.
Venue
Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters
Published
2004
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
A209
ISSN
1099-0062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048468721
Cited by
321
References
0
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.