The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temperature Dependence of the Electrode Kinetics of Oxygen Reduction at the Platinum/Nafion® Interface—A Microelectrode Investigation
Open accessAbstract
A knowledge of the temperature dependence of the electrode‐kinetic parameters for oxygen reduction at the platinum/ proton exchange membrane (PEM) interface and of mass‐transport parameters of oxygen in the PEM is of vital importance in analyzing the performance of proton exchange‐membrane fuel cells. The microelectrode technique which was previously developed to determine these parameters at the platinum/Nafion® interface at 25°C was used in the present investigation at the same electrode/electrolyte interface. This study was carried out in the temperature range of 30–80°C and at 5 atm of oxygen pressure. The results showed a linear increase of the Tafel slope with temperature in the low current density region, but the Tafel slope was found to be independent of temperature in the high current density region. The values of the activation energy for oxygen reduction at the platinum/Nafion® interface are nearly the same as those obtained at the platinum/trifluoromethane sulfonic acid (TFMSA) interface but less than values obtained at the and interfaces. The diffusion coefficient of oxygen in Nafion increases with temperature while its solubility decreases with temperature. These parameters also depend on the water content of the membrane. The conductivity of the membrane increases with temperature until it reaches a plateau at a temperature of 80°C; the dependence of the conductivity on temperature was correlated with the variation of water content of Nafion with temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
Jiao, K., & Li, X. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.002 · Cited by 1,086
Oxygen Reduction on Carbon-Supported Pt−Ni and Pt−Co Alloy Catalysts
Paulus, U. A., Wokaun, A., Scherer, G. G., Schmidt, T. J., Stamenkovic, V., Radmilovic, V., Markovic, N. M., & Ross, P. N. (2002) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp013442l · Cited by 954
Modeling Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020729l · Cited by 738
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2004) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1639157 · Cited by 462
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2003) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1580822 · Cited by 411
Kodama, K., Motobayashi, K., Shinohara, A., Hasegawa, N., Kudo, K., Jinnouchi, R., Osawa, M., & Morimoto, Y. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b03571 · Cited by 258
Modelling the PEM fuel cell cathode
BROKA, K., & EKDUNGE, P. (1997) · Journal of Applied Electrochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1018476612810 · Cited by 243
Zhang, L., Ma, C., & Mukerjee, S. (2003) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0013-4686(03)00257-3 · Cited by 102
Computational study of water transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Um, S., & Wang, C.-Y. (2006) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.095 · Cited by 98
Futter, G. A., Gazdzicki, P., Friedrich, K. A., Latz, A., & Jahnke, T. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.070 · Cited by 94
Two-Phase Dynamic Modeling of PEMFCs and Simulation of Cyclo-Voltammograms
Ziegler, C., Yu, H. M., & Schumacher, J. O. (2005) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1946408 · Cited by 94
Numerical analysis of gas crossover effects in polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs)
Nam, J., Chippar, P., Kim, W., & Ju, H. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.023 · Cited by 82
Sambandam, S., & Ramani, V. (2010) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b921916a · Cited by 49
Modeling an ordered nanostructured cathode catalyst layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Hussain, M. M., Song, D., Liu, Z.-S., & Xie, Z. (2011) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.111 · Cited by 35
Du, C. Y., Yang, T., Shi, P. F., Yin, G. P., & Cheng, X. Q. (2006) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.047 · Cited by 32
Chisaka, M., Matsuoka, E., & Daiguji, H. (2010) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.3439617 · Cited by 30
Sun, C.-N., More, K. L., Veith, G. M., & Zawodzinski, T. A. (2013) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.055309jes · Cited by 28
Gatto, I., Stassi, A., Passalacqua, E., & Aricò, A. S. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.155 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Parthasarathy, A., Srinivasan, S., Appleby, A. J., & Martin, C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1992-09-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2530-2537
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2015708268
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
