Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GITT Analysis of Lithium Insertion Cathodes for Determining the Lithium Diffusion Coefficient at Low Temperature: Challenges and Pitfalls

Open access
Nickol, A., Schied, T., Heubner, C., Schneider, M., Michaelis, A., Bobeth, M., Cuniberti, G.·2020·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

Understanding the diffusion of lithium ions in electrode materials for lithium ion batteries is of great importance for their knowledge-based optimization and development of novel materials and cell designs. The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) is widely applied in battery research to study the diffusion of lithium in anode and cathode materials depending on the degree of lithiation. While transport properties of electrode materials at high and ambient temperatures are largely available, low temperature diffusion and rate coefficients are hardly reported in the literature and vary by orders of magnitude for identical active materials. Herein, we demonstrate and discuss several challenges and pitfalls in the application and evaluation of GITT measurements for determining the effective chemical lithium ion diffusion coefficient in lithium insertion electrodes, which become especially important at low temperature. This includes theoretical considerations and an experimental analysis of the promising cathode material LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 (NCM523) in the wide temperature range of −40 °C to 40 °C. We show how the choice of experimental conditions for the GITT measurements and of the subsequent mathematical evaluation significantly influence the derived diffusion coefficient. The results suggest that the large scattering of reported values of the diffusion coefficient could be caused by the use of different evaluation procedures. Simple calculation methods appear to be less suited the lower the temperature is. It is shown that the complementary use of GITT and EIS supplemented by detailed knowledge of the microstructure of the electrode significantly improves the accuracy of determining the diffusion coefficient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9404

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Metadata

Authors
Nickol, A., Schied, T., Heubner, C., Schneider, M., Michaelis, A., Bobeth, M., & Cuniberti, G.
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2020-01-07
Volume
167
Issue
9
Pages
090546
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W3027522511
Cited by
281
References
47
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GITT Analysis of Lithium Insertion Cathodes for Determining the Lithium Diffusion Coefficient at Low Temperature: Challenges and Pitfalls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1945-7111/ab9404
The paper
Nickol, A., Schied, T., Heubner, C., Schneider, M., Michaelis, A., Bobeth, M., & Cuniberti, G. (2020). GITT Analysis of Lithium Insertion Cathodes for Determining the Lithium Diffusion Coefficient at Low Temperature: Challenges and Pitfalls. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab9404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.