Cited by 44Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies

Low-Temperature Performance Improvement of Graphite Electrode by Allyl Sulfide Additive and Its Film-Forming Mechanism

Open access
Jurng, Sunhyung, Park, Sangjin, Yoon, Taeho, Kim, Hyun-seung, Jeong, Hyejeong, Ryu, Ji Heon, Kim, Jae Jeong, Oh, Seung M.·2016·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

This work describes the beneficial effects given by the allyl sulfide (AS)-derived surface film on the low-temperature performances of graphite electrode and the film-forming mechanism. Adding a small amount of allyl sulfide as an electrolyte additive into a Li/graphite cell increases the reversible capacity of graphite electrode to three times larger than that of the AS-free cell at −30°C. Lithium plating is also suppressed by adding AS into the background electrolyte. An impedance analysis reveals that the charge transfer resistance is significantly lower in the AS-added cell at low-temperatures. When the graphite electrode is soaked in the AS-added electrolyte, allyl sulfide is spontaneously oxidized to produce the sulfur-containing surface film. The as-generated film is then electrochemically reduced during the first lithiaiton period to produce another type of the sulfur-containing film. After repeated cycling, a carbon-rich sulfur-containing film is generated near the graphite surface, while the decomposition products of background electrolyte are deposited in the outer surface region. The presence of the carbon-rich sulfur-containing film near the graphite surface seems to be responsible for the facilitation of charge transfer reaction at low temperatures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/2.0051609jes

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elemental sulfur and allyl disulfide were reported to have the capability to reduce SEI impedance, which can effectively improve low-temperature battery performance.

    “Furthermore, in addition to the sulfur-containing additives mentioned above, elemental sulfur and allyl disulfide were also reported to have the capability to reduce SEI impedance as well, which can effectively improve LT battery performance [116,117].”

    From Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries (2023) · cites this paper as [117]

    The Abstract reports improved low-temperature graphite performance with elemental sulfur, and Results and Discussion reports a comparable improvement with allyl disulfide. Neither passage establishes that these two additives reduce SEI impedance. The paper attributes its measured impedance benefit for allyl sulfide to lower charge-transfer resistance, a different quantity (Results and Discussion, Table I; page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. J. Fan, J. Power Sources, 117, 170 (2003). · DOI
  2. C. K. Huang, J. S. Sakamoto, J. Wolfenstine, and S. Surampudi, J. Electrochem. Soc., 147, 2893 (2000). · DOI
  3. S. S. Zhang, K. Xu, and T. R. Jow, Electrochim. Acta, 49, 1057 (2004). · DOI
  4. F. Nobili, S. Dsoke, T. Mecozzi, and R. Marassi, Electrochim. Acta, 51, 536 (2005). · DOI
  5. J. Li, C. F. Yuan, Z. H. Guo, Z. A. Zhang, Y. Q. Lai, and J. Liu, Electrochim. Acta, 59, 69 (2012). · DOI
  6. A. Yaqub, Y. J. Lee, M. J. Hwang, S. A. Pervez, U. Farooq, J. H. Choi, D. Kim, H. Y. Choi, S. B. Cho, and C. H. Doh, J Mater Sci, 49, 7707 (2014). · DOI
  7. M. Mancini, F. Nobili, S. Dsoke, F. D'Amico, R. Tossici, F. Croce, and R. Marassi, J. Power Sources, 190, 141 (2009). · DOI
  8. M. Marinaro, M. Mancini, F. Nobili, R. Tossici, L. Damen, and R. Marassi, J. Power Sources, 222, 66 (2013). · DOI
  9. O. Yariv, D. Hirshberg, E. Zinigrad, A. Meitav, D. Aurbach, M. Jiang, and B. R. Powell, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, A1422 (2014). · DOI
  10. L. X. Liao, X. Q. Cheng, Y. L. Ma, P. J. Zuo, W. Fang, G. P. Yin, and Y. Z. Gao, Electrochim. Acta, 87, 466 (2013). · DOI
  11. L. X. Liao, T. Fang, X. G. Zhou, Y. Z. Gao, X. Q. Cheng, L. L. Zhang, and G. P. Yin, Solid State Ionics, 254, 27 (2014). · DOI
  12. R. Petibon, C. P. Aiken, N. N. Sinha, J. C. Burns, H. Ye, C. M. VanElzen, G. Jain, S. Trussler, and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, A117 (2013). · DOI
  13. B. Markovsky, M. D. Levi, and D. Aurbach, Electrochim. Acta, 43, 2287 (1998). · DOI
  14. Y. S. Jung, P. Lu, A. S. Cavanagh, C. Ban, G. H. Kim, S. H. Lee, S. M. George, S. J. Harris, and A. C. Dillon, Advanced Energy Materials, 3, 213 (2013). · DOI
  15. A. Zaban, E. Zinigrad, and D. Aurbach, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 3089 (1996). · DOI
  16. D. Aurbach, M. D. Levi, and E. Levi, Solid State Ionics, 179, 742 (2008). · DOI
  17. C. C. Chang, S. H. Hsu, Y. F. Jung, and C. H. Yang, J. Power Sources, 196, 9605 (2011). · DOI
  18. H. Ota, T. Akai, H. Namita, S. Yamaguchi, and M. Nomura, J. Power Sources, 119-121, 567 (2003). · DOI
  19. H. Kim, S. Grugeon, G. Gachot, M. Armand, L. Sannier, and S. Laruelle, Electrochim. Acta, 136, 157 (2014). · DOI
  20. M. T. Stankovich and A. J. Bard, J. Electroanal. Chem., 86, 189 (1978). · DOI
  21. Y. X. Yin, S. Xin, Y. G. Guo, and L. J. Wan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 52, 13186 (2013). · DOI
  22. M. Barghamadi, A. Kapoor, and C. Wen, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, A1256 (2013). · DOI
  23. J. S. Gnanaraj, R. W. Thompson, S. N. Iaconatti, J. F. DiCarlo, and K. M. Abraham, Electrochem Solid St, 8, A128 (2005). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jurng, S., Park, S., Yoon, T., Kim, H.-S., Jeong, H., Ryu, J. H., Kim, J. J., & Oh, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Tech University of Korea (KR)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2016
Volume
163
Issue
8
Pages
A1798-A1804
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W2472912193
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2010-0029065, NRF-2010-C1AAA001-2010-0029065, 0029065, 2010-C1AAA001-2010-0029065)
  • LG Chem
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Keywords
allyl sulfides, electrolyte additives, graphite electrodes, low-temperature performance, reversible capacity, film-forming mechanism, charge transfer resistance, electrolyte decomposition products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review