The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing Areal Capacities through Understanding the Limitations of Lithium-Ion Electrodes
Open accessAbstract
Increasing the areal capacity or electrode thickness in lithium ion batteries is one possible means to increase pack level energy density while simultaneously lowering cost. The physics that limit use of high areal capacity as a function of battery power to energy ratio are poorly understood and thus most currently produced automotive lithium ion cells utilize modest loadings to ensure long life over the vehicle battery operation. Here we show electrolyte transport limits the utilization of the positive electrode at critical C-rates during discharge; whereas, a combination of electrolyte transport and polarization lead to lithium plating in the graphite electrode during charge. Experimental measurements are compared with theoretical predictions based on concentrated solution and porous electrode theories. An analytical expression is derived to provide design criteria for long lived operation based on the physical properties of the electrode and electrolyte. Finally, a guideline is proposed that graphite cells should avoid charge current densities near or above 4 mA/cm 2 unless additional precautions have been made to avoid deleterious side reaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell
Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F., & Newman, J. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2221597 · Cited by 4,328
Simulation and Optimization of the Dual Lithium Ion Insertion Cell
Fuller, T. F., Doyle, M., & Newman, J. (1994) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2054684 · Cited by 2,057
Arora, P., Doyle, M., & White, R. E. (1999) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1392512 · Cited by 586
Cited by
Lithium-ion battery fast charging: A review
Tomaszewska, A., Chu, Z., Feng, X., O'Kane, S., Liu, X., Chen, J., Ji, C., Endler, E., Li, R., Liu, L., et al. (2019) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2019.100011 · Cited by 1,592
A review of current collectors for lithium-ion batteries
Zhu, P., Gastol, D., Marshall, J., Sommerville, R., Goodship, V., & Kendrick, E. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229321 · Cited by 523
Enabling fast charging – A battery technology gap assessment
Ahmed, S., Bloom, I., Jansen, A. N., Tanim, T., Dufek, E. J., Pesaran, A., Burnham, A., Carlson, R. B., Dias, F., Hardy, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.055 · Cited by 498
Self-citationZheng, J., Kim, M. S., Tu, Z., Choudhury, S., Tang, T., & Archer, L. A. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00883g · Cited by 466
Huang, J., Xie, Y., You, Y., Yuan, J., Xu, Q., Xie, H., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202213095 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallagher, K. G., Trask, S. E., Bauer, C., Woehrle, T., Lux, S. F., Tschech, M., Lamp, P., Polzin, B. J., Ha, S., Long, B., Wu, Q., Lu, W., Dees, D. W., & Jansen, A. N.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2015-11-10
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- A138-A149
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2223057163
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.