Cited by 43Muscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and DisordersNutrition and Health in Aging

Short-term prednisone use antagonizes insulin's anabolic effect on muscle protein and glucose metabolism in young healthy people

Open access
Short, Kevin R., Bigelow, Maureen L., Nair, K. Sreekumaran·2009·American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism

Abstract

Glucocorticoids cause muscle atrophy and weakness, but the mechanisms for these effects are unclear. The purpose of this study was to test a hypothesis that prednisone (Pred) counteracts insulin's anabolic effects on muscle. A randomized, double-blind cross-over design was used to test the effects of 6 days either Pred (0.8 mg·kg−1·day−1) or placebo use in seven healthy young volunteers. Protein dynamics were measured across the leg using stable isotope tracers of leucine (Leu) and phenylalanine (Phe) after overnight fast and during a hyperinsulinemic (1.5 μU·min−1·kg FFM−1) euglycemic clamp with amino acid replacement. Fasting glucose, amino acids, insulin, and glucagon were higher ( P < 0.01) on Pred vs. placebo, whereas leg blood flow was 18% lower. However, basal whole body and leg kinetics of Leu and Phe were unaltered by Pred. Insulin infusion increased leg glucose uptake in both trials but was 65% lower with Pred than with placebo. Insulin in both trials similarly suppressed whole body flux of Leu and Phe. Importantly, insulin increased net Leu and Phe balance across the leg and the balance between muscle protein synthesis and breakdown, but these changes were 45–140% lower ( P < 0.03) in Pred than in placebo. The present study demonstrates that short-term Pred use in healthy people does not alter whole body or leg muscle protein metabolism during the postaborptive state but causes muscle insulin resistance for both glucose and amino acid metabolism, with a blunted protein anabolism. This interactive effect may lead to muscle atrophy with continued use of glucocorticoids.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpendo.00345.2009

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 60 mg prednisolone daily stimulated breakdown of skeletal muscle tissue.

    “In addition, 60 mg prednisolone daily was shown to stimulate breakdown of skeletal muscle tissue [12].”

    From Low-dose glucocorticoid treatment affects multiple aspects of intermediary metabolism in healthy humans: a randomised controlled trial (2011) · cites this paper as [12]

    The study used prednisone at 0.8 mg/kg/day, not a fixed 60 mg daily dose. Its Discussion (page unavailable) reports that leg protein breakdown rates did not significantly change; prednisone instead blunted insulin’s anabolic effect, which the authors suggest could lead to muscle loss if sustained. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Jones B, Gilligan J. Amino acid analysis by O-pthaldehyde pre-column derivitization and reversed phase HPLC. Am Biotechnol Lab 12: 45–51, 1983 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Short, K. R., Bigelow, M. L., & Nair, K. S.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Nair, K. Sreekumaran
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2009-12
Volume
297
Issue
6
Pages
E1260-E1268
ISSN
  • 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1555
OpenAlex
W2169773860
Cited by
43
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32-DK-07352, R01DK41973, R01DK041973, T32DK007352)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00 585, M01RR000585)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
prednisone, glucocorticoids, insulin resistance, muscle protein synthesis, muscle protein degradation, muscle atrophy, glucose metabolism, amino acid metabolism, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, leg blood flow, muscle protein balance, postabsorptive state
MeSH terms
Adult, Biopsy, Calorimetry, Indirect, Double-Blind Method, Energy Metabolism, Female, Glucocorticoids, Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Antagonists, Leg, Male, Muscle Proteins, Prednisone, Glucose Clamp Technique, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review