Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hyperdynamic circulation in portal-hypertensive rat model: a primary factor for maintenance of chronic portal hypertension

Vorobioff, J., Bredfeldt, J. E., Groszmann, R. J.·1983·American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology

Abstract

Two dissimilar hemodynamic hypotheses, the “backward flow” theory and the “forward flow” theory, have been advanced to define splanchnic hemodynamics in portal hypertension. An animal model with portal hypertension and high-grade portal-systemic shunting, the portal vein-stenotic rat, was studied to determine whether a hemodynamic picture compatible with either theory would develop. Splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics and portal-systemic shunting were measured by radioactive microsphere techniques. The portal-hypertensive rats (portal pressure, 12.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.3 +/- 0.4 mmHg) with greater than 95% portal-systemic shunting had a 60% increase in portal venous inflow (23.46 +/- 2.54 vs. 14.97 +/- 1.61 ml/min; P less than 0.01) with a concomitant 50% decrease in splanchnic arteriolar resistance (3.86 +/- 0.43 vs. 7.60 +/- 0.80 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(5); P less than 0.001) compared with control rats. Cardiac index (391 +/- 17 vs. 250 +/- 20 ml . min-1 . kg-1) was elevated 50% (P less than 0.001), and total peripheral resistance (7.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 11.7 +/- 0.8 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(4)) was decreased 60% (P less than 0.001). The resistance to portal blood flow in portal vein-stenotic rats (4.77 +/- 0.57 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(4)) was similar to the resistance to portal blood flow in control rats (4.82 +/- 0.43 dyn . s . cm-5 . 10(4)), indicating that the hyperdynamic portal venous inflow, not resistance, provided the main impetus for maintaining the elevated portal venous pressure. The splanchnic hemodynamic observations directly support the forward flow theory of portal hypertension. The relation between splanchnic arteriolar resistance and total peripheral resistance (r = 0.67; P less than 0.01) indicated that the systemic hemodynamic parameters were secondarily altered by the splanchnic hemodynamic changes. This animal model of chronic portal hypertension gave evidence for a generalized splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation occurring in the presence of high-grade portal-systemic shunting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpgi.1983.244.1.g52

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Vorobioff, J., Bredfeldt, J. E., & Groszmann, R. J.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
Published
1983-01-01
Volume
244
Issue
1
Pages
G52-G57
ISSN
  • 0193-1857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1547
OpenAlex
W2181846122
Cited by
432
References
10
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperdynamic circulation in portal-hypertensive rat model: a primary factor for maintenance of chronic portal hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpgi.1983.244.1.g52
The paper
Vorobioff, J., Bredfeldt, J. E., & Groszmann, R. J. (1983). Hyperdynamic circulation in portal-hypertensive rat model: a primary factor for maintenance of chronic portal hypertension. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1983.244.1.g52

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.