Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation

Convertino, Victor A.·1998·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

Functions of carotid and aortic baroreflex control of heart rate (HR), cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of vascular resistance, adrenoreceptor responsiveness, indexes of baseline vagal and sympathetic tone, circulating blood volume, and venous compliance were compared in men and women to test the hypothesis that lower orthostatic tolerance in women would be associated with lower responsiveness of specific mechanisms of blood pressure regulation. HR, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q˙), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), central venous pressure, forearm (FVR) and leg (LVR) vascular resistance, catecholamines, and changes in leg volume (%ΔLV) were measured during various protocols of lower body negative pressure (LBNP), carotid stimulation, and infusions of adrenoreceptor agonists in 7 females and 10 males matched for age and fitness. LBNP tolerance for the women (797 ± 63 mmHg/min) was 35% lower ( P = 0.002) than 1,235 ± 101 mmHg/min for the men. At presyncope, SV,Q˙, MAP, and %ΔLV were lower ( P < 0.05) in females compared with males, whereas HR, FVR, and total peripheral resistance were similar in both groups. Lower LBNP tolerance in females was associated with reduced HR response to carotid baroreceptor stimulation, lower baseline cardiac vagal activity, greater decline inQ˙ induced by LBNP, increased β 1-adrenoreceptor responsiveness, greater vasoconstriction under equal LBNP, lower levels of circulating NE at presyncope, and lower relative blood volume. The results of this investigation support the hypothesis that women have less responsiveness in mechanisms that underlie blood pressure regulation under orthostatic challenge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.6.r1909

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Convertino, V. A.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
275
Issue
6
Pages
R1909-R1920
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W1946385051
Cited by
328
References
2
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.6.r1909
The paper
Convertino, V. A. (1998). Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.6.r1909

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.