The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation
Abstract
Functions of carotid and aortic baroreflex control of heart rate (HR), cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of vascular resistance, adrenoreceptor responsiveness, indexes of baseline vagal and sympathetic tone, circulating blood volume, and venous compliance were compared in men and women to test the hypothesis that lower orthostatic tolerance in women would be associated with lower responsiveness of specific mechanisms of blood pressure regulation. HR, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q˙), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), central venous pressure, forearm (FVR) and leg (LVR) vascular resistance, catecholamines, and changes in leg volume (%ΔLV) were measured during various protocols of lower body negative pressure (LBNP), carotid stimulation, and infusions of adrenoreceptor agonists in 7 females and 10 males matched for age and fitness. LBNP tolerance for the women (797 ± 63 mmHg/min) was 35% lower ( P = 0.002) than 1,235 ± 101 mmHg/min for the men. At presyncope, SV,Q˙, MAP, and %ΔLV were lower ( P < 0.05) in females compared with males, whereas HR, FVR, and total peripheral resistance were similar in both groups. Lower LBNP tolerance in females was associated with reduced HR response to carotid baroreceptor stimulation, lower baseline cardiac vagal activity, greater decline inQ˙ induced by LBNP, increased β 1-adrenoreceptor responsiveness, greater vasoconstriction under equal LBNP, lower levels of circulating NE at presyncope, and lower relative blood volume. The results of this investigation support the hypothesis that women have less responsiveness in mechanisms that underlie blood pressure regulation under orthostatic challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
COWLEY, A. W., LIARD, J. F., & GUYTON, A. C. (1973) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.32.5.564 · Cited by 593
The Continuous Recording of Central Venous Pressure Changes from an Arm Vein
GAUER, O. H., & SIEKER, H. O. (1956) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.4.1.74 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Where are all the female participants in Sports and Exercise Medicine research?
Costello, J. T., Bieuzen, F., & Bleakley, C. M. (2014) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2014.911354 · Cited by 599
Chapman, C. R., & Vierck, C. J. (2017) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.004 · Cited by 423
Lower body negative pressure as a model to study progression to acute hemorrhagic shock in humans
Cooke, W. H., Ryan, K. L., & Convertino, V. A. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01155.2003 · Cited by 346
Self-citationPoon, I. O., & Braun, U. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2005.00629.x · Cited by 265
Waters, W. W., Ziegler, M. G., & Meck, J. V. (2002) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00544.2001 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Convertino, V. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- R1909-R1920
- ISSN
- 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1490
- OpenAlex
- W1946385051
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.6.r1909
- The paper
- Convertino, V. A. (1998). Gender differences in autonomic functions associated with blood pressure regulation. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1998.275.6.r1909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.