Cited by 221Muscle metabolism and nutritionAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsBiochemical effects in animals

Increase of total creatine in human brain after oral supplementation of creatine-monohydrate

Dechent, P., Pouwels, P. J. W., Wilken, B., Hanefeld, F., Frahm, J.·1999·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

The effect of oral creatine supplementation on brain metabolite concentrations was investigated in gray matter, white matter, cerebellum, and thalamus of healthy young volunteers by means of quantitative localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo (2.0 T, stimulated echo acquisition mode sequence; repetition time = 6,000 ms, echo time = 20 ms, middle interval = 10 ms, automated spectral evaluation). Oral consumption of 4 × 5 g creatine-monohydrate/day for 4 wk yielded a statistically significant increase (8.7% corresponding to 0.6 mM, P < 0.001) of the mean concentration of total creatine (tCr) when averaged across brain regions and subjects ( n = 6). The data revealed considerable intersubject variability (3.5–13.3%), with the smallest increases observed for the two male volunteers with the largest body weights. A regional analysis resulted in significant increases of tCr in gray matter (4.7%), white matter (11.5%), and cerebellum (5.4%) and was most pronounced in thalamus (14.6% corresponding to 1.0 mM). Other findings were significant decreases of N-acetyl-containing compounds in cerebellum and thalamus as well as of choline-containing compounds in thalamus. All cerebral metabolic alterations caused by oral Cr were reversible, as evidenced by control measurements at least 3 mo after the diet. This work demonstrates that excess consumption of Cr yields regionally dependent increases of the tCr concentration in human brain over periods of several weeks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.3.r698

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dechent, P., Pouwels, P. J. W., Wilken, B., Hanefeld, F., & Frahm, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
1999-09-01
Volume
277
Issue
3
Pages
R698-R704
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2139463702
Cited by
221
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
Keywords
creatine supplementation, creatine monohydrate, total creatine, brain metabolites, regional brain differences, gray matter, white matter, cerebellum, thalamus, choline-containing compounds, body weight
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Brain, Creatine, Diet, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review