Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Families of lines: random effects in linear regression analysis

Feldman, H. A.·1988·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Laboratory experiments often involve two groups of subjects, with a linear phenomenon observed in each subject. Simple linear regression as propounded in standard textbooks is inadequate to treat this experimental design, particularly when it comes to dealing with random variation of slopes and intercepts among subjects. The author describes several techniques that can be used to compare two independent families of lines and illustrates their use with laboratory data. The methods are described tutorially, compared, and discussed in the context of more sophisticated and more naive approaches to this common data-analytic problem. Technical details are supplied in APPENDIX A.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.4.1721

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Feldman, H. A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1988-04-01
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
1721-1732
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2163426512
Cited by
223
References
2
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Families of lines: random effects in linear regression analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1988.64.4.1721
The paper
Feldman, H. A. (1988). Families of lines: random effects in linear regression analysis. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1988.64.4.1721

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.