Cited by 596Spaceflight effects on biologyCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Orthostatic intolerance after spaceflight

Buckey, J. C., Lane, L. D., Levine, B. D., Watenpaugh, D. E., Wright, S. J., Moore, W. E., Gaffney, F. A., Blomqvist, C. G.·1996·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Orthostatic intolerance occurs commonly after spaceflight, and important aspects of the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We studied 14 individuals supine and standing before and after three space shuttle missions of 9-14 days. After spaceflight, 9 of the 14 (64%) crew members could not complete a 10-min stand test that all completed preflight. Pre- and postflight supine hemodynamics were similar in both groups except for slightly higher systolic and mean arterial pressures preflight in the finishers [15 +/- 3.7 and 8 +/- 1.2 (SE) mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05]. Postflight, finishers and nonfinishers had equally large postural reductions in stroke volume (-47 +/- 3.7 and -48 +/- 3.3 ml, respectively) and increases in heart rate (35 +/- 6.6 and 51 +/- 5.2 beats/min, respectively). Cardiac output during standing was also similar (3.6 +/- 0.4 and 4.1 +/- 0.3 l/min, respectively). However, the finishers had a greater postflight vasoconstrictor response with higher total peripheral resistance during standing (22.3 +/- 1.2 units preflight and 29.4 +/- 2.3 units postflight) than did the nonfinishers (20.1 +/- 1.1 units preflight and 19.9 +/- 1.4 units postflight). We conclude that 1) the primary systemic hemodynamic event, i.e., the postural decrease in stroke volume, was similar in finishers and nonfinishers and 2) the heart rate response and cardiac output during standing were not significantly different, but 3) the postural vasoconstrictor response was significantly greater among the finishers (P < 0.01).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Up to two-thirds of astronauts have orthostatic intolerance or hypotension after spaceflight.

    “However, because up to two-thirds of astronauts have orthostatic intolerance or hypotension after spaceflight (Buckey et al. 1996)”
  • In astronauts, reductions in total peripheral resistance contribute importantly to post-spaceflight orthostatic intolerance.

    “In astronauts, reductions in total peripheral resistance contribute importantly to post-spaceflight orthostatic intolerance (Buckey et al. 1996).”
  • Postflight orthostatic intolerance on return to Earth has been noted following both short- and long-term flights, especially in women astronauts.

    “Since the inception of space missions, a postflight orthostatic intolerance on return to Earth has been noted following both short-and long-term flights, especially in women astronauts.”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Even after brief space trips, approximately one-fourth to two-thirds of astronauts cannot stand for even 10 min upon return to Earth.

    “Even after brief trips, approximately one-fourth to two-thirds of astronauts cannot stand for even 10 min upon return to earth (16)(17)(18).”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Many studies have demonstrated that prolonged bedrest or microgravity exposure can result in a POTS-like syndrome characterized by a tachycardic orthostatic intolerance even in previously healthy and active individuals.

    “Many studies have demonstrated that prolonged bedrest or microgravity exposure can result in a POTS-like syndrome characterized by a tachycardic orthostatic intolerance even in previously healthy and active individuals (17,18,25,27,57-60).”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [17]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckey, J. C., Lane, L. D., Levine, B. D., Watenpaugh, D. E., Wright, S. J., Moore, W. E., Gaffney, F. A., & Blomqvist, C. G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
7-18
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1852131826
Cited by
596
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
orthostatic intolerance, spaceflight, Space Shuttle, stroke volume, heart rate, cardiac output, vasoconstriction, systemic vascular resistance, crew members, microgravity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Leg, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Posture, Regional Blood Flow, Space Flight, Stroke Volume, Vascular Resistance, Vasoconstriction, Weightlessness, Baroreflex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review