Cited by 146Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMotor Control and AdaptationNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Cortical and subcortical control of tongue movement in humans: a functional neuroimaging study using fMRI

Corfield, D. R., Murphy, K., Josephs, O., Fink, G. R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Guz, A., Adams, L., Turner, R.·1999·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

We have used voluntary tongue contraction to test whether we can image activation of the hypoglossal nuclei within the human brain stem by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Functional images of the whole brain were acquired in eight subjects by using T2-weighted echo planar imaging (blood oxygen level development) every 6.2 s. Sequences of images were acquired during 12 periods of 31-s "isometric" rhythmic tongue contraction alternated with 12 periods of 31-s tongue relaxation. Noise arising from cardiac- and respiratory-related movement was removed either by filtration (high pass; cutoff 120 s) or by inclusion in the statistical analysis as confounding effects of no interest. For the group, tongue contraction was associated with significant signal increases (P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons) in the sensorimotor cortex, supplementary motor area, operculum, insula, thalamus, and cerebellum. For the group and for six of eight individuals, significant signal increases were also seen within the medulla (P < 0.001, predefined region of interest with no correction for multiple comparisons); this signal is most likely to reflect neuronal activation associated with the hypoglossal motor nuclei. The data demonstrate that fMRI can be used to detect, simultaneously, the cerebral and brain stem control of tongue movement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1468

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corfield, D. R., Murphy, K., Josephs, O., Fink, G. R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Guz, A., Adams, L., & Turner, R.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
1468-1477
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1957059088
Cited by
146
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
tongue movement, sensorimotor cortex, supplementary motor area, operculum, insula, thalamus, cerebellum, medulla, BOLD signal, motor control
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Heart Rate, Hemodynamics, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Tongue, Respiratory Mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review