Cited by 99Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neural systems supporting timing and chronometric counting: an FMRI study

Open access
Hinton, Sean C., Harrington, Deborah L., Binder, Jeffrey R., Durgerian, Sally, Rao, Stephen M.·2004·Cognitive Brain Research

Abstract

At least two strategies are available to humans for estimating multisecond intervals. One depends on an interval timing system that is common to many species. The other is the language-based strategy of chronometric counting. These two strategies are easily distinguished by the psychophysical properties of their behavioral correlates: counting supports substantially more precise estimates than are possible using the more general interval timing system. The present study investigates the neural systems that underlie the execution of these different strategies. Eighteen adults reproduced a 16-s interval either by internally timing or covertly counting the duration. Comparison of counting and timing to a resting baseline suggested that these strategies engage some nonoverlapping neural systems. Counting, but not timing, strongly activated Broca's area, primary motor cortex in the mouth region, and right cerebellum, all of which are associated with internal speech. Counting also activated parts of the medial premotor circuit, including the putamen, supplementary motor area (SMA) proper, and cingulate motor area (CMA), that have been associated with reproducing isochronous and syncopated rhythms of elements lasting hundreds of milliseconds. During timing, only a portion of this circuit, the SMA proper and CMA, was engaged. Both timing and counting interfered with semantic processing during the resting state, evidenced by task-related decreases in the left inferior and middle frontal gyri, right superior frontal gyrus, left angular gyrus, and bilateral posterior cingulate cortex. This study suggests that counting activates a corticostriatal network associated with millisecond, rhythmic timing. In contrast, timing long durations without the benefit of linguistic strategies for subdividing counts reduces activity in this circuitry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.04.009

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Left putamen activation is associated with counting and reading written syllables, consistent with the putamen being involved in timing of speech production.

    “This might explain why left putamen activation was associated with counting (Hinton et al., 2004) and reading written syllables (Bohland and Guenther, 2006) and is consistent with prior claims that the putamen is involved in the timing of speech production.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinton, S. C., Harrington, D. L., Binder, J. R., Durgerian, S., & Rao, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Hinton, Sean C.
Venue
Cognitive Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
183-192
ISSN
0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035524700
Cited by
99
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health (RR00058)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P01MH51358, P01MH051358)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00058, M01RR000058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
interval timing, duration estimation, Broca's area, supplementary motor area, cingulate motor area, corticostriatal network, cerebellum, inner speech, semantic processing, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mathematics, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Time Factors, Time Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review