Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The maximally attainable V̇o2during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue

Day, J. R., Rossiter, H. B., Coats, E. M., Skasick, A., Whipp, B. J.·2003·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The quantification of maximum oxygen uptake (V̇o 2 max), a parameter characterizing the effective integration of the neural, cardiopulmonary, and metabolic systems, requires oxygen uptake (V̇o 2) to attain a plateau. We were interested in whether a V̇o 2 plateau was consistently manifest during maximal incremental ramp cycle ergometry and also in ascertaining the relationship between this peak V̇o 2(V̇o 2 peak) and that determined from one, or several, maximal constant-load tests. Ventilatory and pulmonary gas-exchange variables were measured breath by breath with a turbine and mass spectrometer. On average, V̇o 2 peak[3.51 ± 0.8 (SD) l/min] for the ramp test did not differ from that extrapolated from the linear phase of the response in 71 subjects. In 12 of these subjects, the V̇o 2 peak was less than the extrapolated value by 0.1-0.4 l/min (i.e., a “plateau”), and in 19 subjects, V̇o 2 peak was higher by 0.05-0.4 l/min. In the remaining 40 subjects, we could not discriminate a difference. The V̇o 2 peak from the incremental test also did not differ from that of a single maximum constant-load test in 38 subjects or from the V̇o 2 max in 6 subjects who undertook a range of progressively greater discontinuous constant-load tests. A plateau in the actual V̇o 2 response is therefore not an obligatory consequence of incremental exercise. Because the peak value attained was not different from the plateau in the plot of V̇o 2 vs. work rate (for the constant-load tests), the V̇o 2 peak attained on a maximum-effort incremental test is likely to be a valid index of V̇o 2 max, despite no evidence of a plateau in the data themselves. However, without additional tests, one cannot be certain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00024.2003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Day, J. R., Rossiter, H. B., Coats, E. M., Skasick, A., & Whipp, B. J.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2003-11
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
1901-1907
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2006580799
Cited by
447
References
5
FWCI
18.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.