Cited by 401Spaceflight effects on biologyMuscle Physiology and DisordersSpace Exploration and Technology

Skeletal muscle unweighting: spaceflight and ground-based models

Open access
Adams, Gregory R., Caiozzo, Vincent J., Baldwin, Kenneth M.·2003·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Long-term manned spaceflight requires that flight crews be exposed to extended periods of unweighting of antigravity skeletal muscles. This exposure will result in adaptations in these muscles that have the potential to debilitate crew members on return to increased gravity environments. Therefore, the development of countermeasures to prevent these unwanted adaptations is an important requirement. The limited access to microgravity environments for the purpose of studying muscle adaptation and evaluating countermeasure programs has necessitated the use of ground-based models to conduct both basic and applied muscle physiology research. In this review, the published results from ground-based models of muscle unweighting are presented and compared with the results from related spaceflight research. The models of skeletal muscle unweighting with a sufficient body of literature included bed rest, cast immobilization, and unilateral lower limb suspension. Comparisons of changes in muscle strength and size between these models in the context of the limited results available from spaceflight suggest that each model may be useful for the investigation of certain aspects of the skeletal muscle unweighting that occur in microgravity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00346.2003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skeletal muscle size and function continue to decline with the length of exposure until an asymptotic saturation is reached.

    “Studies in adults documented that skeletal muscle size and function are already reduced after a few days of bed rest (12) and continue to decline with the length of exposure (13) until an asymptotic saturation is reached.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, G. R., Caiozzo, V. J., & Baldwin, K. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2003-12
Volume
95
Issue
6
Pages
2185-2201
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2080869774
Cited by
401
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NCC 9‐58)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ar046856-05, 5r01ar045594-05)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-45594, AR-46856)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
muscle atrophy, microgravity, spaceflight, countermeasures, bed rest, cast immobilization, muscle strength, muscle size, muscle adaptation
MeSH terms
Animals, Bed Rest, Humans, Models, Biological, Space Flight, Weightlessness, Databases, Factual, Weightlessness Simulation, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review