Cited by 831Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Physiology of obesity and effects on lung function

Salome, Cheryl M., King, Gregory G., Berend, Norbert·2010·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

In obese people, the presence of adipose tissue around the rib cage and abdomen and in the visceral cavity loads the chest wall and reduces functional residual capacity (FRC). The reduction in FRC and in expiratory reserve volume is detectable, even at a modest increase in weight. However, obesity has little direct effect on airway caliber. Spirometric variables decrease in proportion to lung volumes, but are rarely below the normal range, even in the extremely obese, while reductions in expiratory flows and increases in airway resistance are largely normalized by adjusting for lung volumes. Nevertheless, the reduction in FRC has consequences for other aspects of lung function. A low FRC increases the risk of both expiratory flow limitation and airway closure. Marked reductions in expiratory reserve volume may lead to abnormalities in ventilation distribution, with closure of airways in the dependent zones of the lung and ventilation perfusion inequalities. Greater airway closure during tidal breathing is associated with lower arterial oxygen saturation in some subjects, even though lung CO-diffusing capacity is normal or increased in the obese. Bronchoconstriction has the potential to enhance the effects of obesity on airway closure and thus on ventilation distribution. Thus obesity has effects on lung function that can reduce respiratory well-being, even in the absence of specific respiratory disease, and may also exaggerate the effects of existing airway disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00694.2009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck) can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics, usually in a dose-response fashion.

    “Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck), can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics,92–112 usually in a dose-response fashion.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salome, C. M., King, G. G., & Berend, N.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Salome, Cheryl M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2010-01
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
206-211
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2155526377
Cited by
831
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 43
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obesity, lung function, functional residual capacity, expiratory reserve volume, airway closure, expiratory flow limitation, ventilation distribution, ventilation-perfusion inequality, bronchoconstriction, arterial oxygen saturation, airway resistance, spirometry
MeSH terms
Animals, Functional Residual Capacity, Humans, Lung Diseases, Models, Biological, Obesity, Pulmonary Ventilation, Respiratory Mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review