Cited by 125Body Composition Measurement TechniquesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The effect of adiposity measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on lung function

Open access
Sutherland, T. J. T., Goulding, A., Grant, A. M., Cowan, J. O., Williamson, A., Williams, S. M., Skinner, M. A., Taylor, D. R.·2008·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Respiratory function is impaired in obesity but there are limitations with body mass index and skin-fold thickness in assessing this effect. The present authors hypothesised that the regional distribution of body fat and lean mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), might be more informative than conventional measurements of total body fat. In total, 107 subjects (55 female, 51.4%) aged 20–50 yrs with no respiratory disease were recruited. Respiratory function tests, anthropometric measurements and a DXA scan were performed. Partial correlation and linear regression analyses were used to explore the effect of adiposity and lean body mass on respiratory function. The majority of respiratory function parameters were significantly correlated with DXA and non-DXA measurements of body fat. Neither thoracic nor abdominal fat had a greater effect. There were some differences in the effect of adiposity between the sexes. Respiratory function was negatively associated with lean body mass in females but positively associated in males. This disappeared after adjustment in females but remained in males. The effects of thoracic and abdominal body fat on respiratory function are comparable but cannot be separated from one another.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00112407

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck) can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics, usually in a dose-response fashion.

    “Added weight on the thorax and abdomen (and also the neck), can significantly affect static and dynamic lung volumes along with respiratory mechanics,92–112 usually in a dose-response fashion.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutherland, T. J. T., Goulding, A., Grant, A. M., Cowan, J. O., Williamson, A., Williams, S. M., Skinner, M. A., & Taylor, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2008-03-19
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
85-91
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2125810224
Cited by
125
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, adiposity, lung function, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, abdominal fat, lean body mass, body mass index, sex differences, respiratory function
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Ventilation, Cohort Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review