Cited by 30Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Postsynaptic muscarinic M1 receptors activate prefrontal cortical EEG of C57BL/6J mouse

Douglas, Christopher L., Baghdoyan, Helen A., Lydic, Ralph·2002·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Recent pharmacological studies exploring the functional roles of muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) subtypes in prefrontal cortex of C57BL/6J (B6) mouse have provided evidence for a presynaptic M2 autoreceptor. The B6 mouse was chosen for these studies because it is a genetically well-characterized model that also provides the genomic background for many genetically modified mice. In addition to increasing ACh release, one functional consequence of pharmacologically blocking the cortical M2 autoreceptor is activation of the contralateral prefrontal cortical EEG. To date, the mechanisms through which M2 autoreceptor antagonism causes cortical EEG activation have not been investigated. The present study tested the hypothesis that, in the B6 mouse, prefrontal cortical ACh activates the contralateral prefrontal EEG via postsynaptic M1 receptors. This hypothesis was tested in 15 mice using in vivo microdialysis delivery of muscarinic antagonists with simultaneous quantification of ACh release, number of 7- to 14-Hz EEG spindles, and fast Fourier transformation analysis of prefrontal EEG. Dialysis delivery of the nonsubtype selective muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (10 nM) significantly (P = 0.01) increased ACh release. Quantitative EEG analysis showed that scopolamine did not alter contralateral prefrontal cortical EEG. To differentiate mAChR subtypes mediating pre- versus postsynaptic responses, additional experiments used muscarinic antagonists with different affinities for the five mAChR subtypes. Microdialysis delivery of 3 nM AF-DX 116, a muscarinic antagonist with relatively high affinity for the M2 and M4 subtypes, significantly (P < 0.01) increased prefrontal cortical ACh release and activated EEG in the contralateral prefrontal cortex. EEG activation was characterized by a significant decrease in number of 7- to 14-Hz EEG spindles (P < 0.0001) and power (Vrms) of EEG slow waves (P < 0.05). Microdialysis delivery of 3 nM AF-DX 116 plus 3 nM pirenzepine, a relatively selective M1 and M4 muscarinic antagonist, also significantly (P < 0.01) increased ACh release but did not decrease the number of EEG spindles and did not change EEG slow waves. The differential EEG and ACh responses to dialysis delivery of the muscarinic antagonists support the conclusion that, in B6 mouse, postsynaptic muscarinic receptors of the M1 subtype are a primary site by which ACh activates the EEG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00318.2002

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • M1/M5 receptors can stimulate dopamine release from striatal synaptosomes and postsynaptic M1/M5 receptors can increase excitability of cortical pyramidal neurons.

    “In contrast, M1/M5 receptors can stimulate dopamine (DA) release from striatal synaptosomes (Zhang et al., 2002) and postsynaptic M1/M5 receptors can increase excitability of cortical pyramidal neurons (Douglas et al., 2002; McCormick and Prince, 1985).”
  • Presynaptic M2/M4 muscarinic receptors can act as inhibitory autoreceptors on cholinergic terminals and reduce glutamate release from corticocortical and corticostriatal synapses.

    “presynaptic M2/M4 mAChRs can act as inhibitory autoreceptors on cholinergic terminals (Douglas et al., 2002; Raiteri et al., 1984) and reduce glutamate release from corticocortical and corticostriatal synapses (Higley et al 2009, Gil et al 1997).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, C. L., Baghdoyan, H. A., & Lydic, R.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
3003-3009
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2081589923
Cited by
30
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL057120, HL 65272, HL 57120, R01HL065272)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-45361)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
M1 muscarinic receptor, prefrontal cortex, cortical EEG, EEG spindles, acetylcholine release, scopolamine, AF-DX 116, pirenzepine, cholinergic neurotransmission, C57BL/6J mice, EEG slow waves, antimuscarinic agents
MeSH terms
Animals, Electroencephalography, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, Muscarinic, Synapses, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptor, Muscarinic M1, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review