Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurons in the Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex Respond to Fat Texture Independently of Viscosity

Verhagen, Justus V., Rolls, Edmund T., Kadohisa, Mikiko·2003·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

The primate orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is a site of convergence from primary taste, olfactory, and somatosensory cortical areas. We describe the responses of a population of single neurons in the OFC that respond to orally applied fat (e.g., safflower oil) and to substances with a similar texture but different chemical composition, such as mineral oil (hydrocarbon) and silicone oil [(Si(CH 3)2 O)n]. These findings provide evidence that the neurons respond to the oral texture of fat, sensed by the somatosensory system. Use of an oral viscosity stimulus consisting of carboxymethyl-cellulose in the range 1–10,000 centipoise (cP) showed that the responses of these fat-sensitive neurons are not related to stimulus viscosity. Thus a textural component independent of viscosity and related to the slick or oily property is being used to activate these oral fat-sensitive neurons. Moreover, a separate population of neurons responds to viscosity (produced, e.g., by the carboxymethyl-cellulose series), but not to fat with the same viscosity. Thus there is a dissociation between texture channels used to sense fat viscosity and non–fat-produced viscosity. Further, free fatty acids such as linoleic acid do not activate these neurons, providing further evidence that the oral fat-sensing mechanism through which these OFC neurons are activated is not gustatory but textural. Most of this population of fat-sensitive neurons receive convergent taste inputs. These results provide evidence about how oral fat is sensed and are relevant to understanding the physiological and pathophysiological processes related to fat intake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00320.2003

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Verhagen, J. V., Rolls, E. T., & Kadohisa, M.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2003-09
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
1514-1525
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2107537444
Cited by
163
References
7
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurons in the Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex Respond to Fat Texture Independently of Viscosity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00320.2003
The paper
Verhagen, J. V., Rolls, E. T., & Kadohisa, M. (2003). Neurons in the Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex Respond to Fat Texture Independently of Viscosity. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00320.2003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.