Cited by 124Neural dynamics and brain functionSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

EEG Slow (∼1 Hz) Waves Are Associated With Nonstationarity of Thalamo-Cortical Sensory Processing in the Sleeping Human

Massimini, Marcello, Rosanova, Mario, Mariotti, Maurizio·2003·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Intracellular studies reveal that, during slow wave sleep (SWS), the entire cortical network can swing rhythmically between extremely different microstates, ranging from wakefulness-like network activation to functional disconnection in the space of a few hundred milliseconds. This alternation of states also involves the thalamic neurons and is reflected in the EEG by a slow (<1 Hz) oscillation. These rhythmic changes, occurring in the thalamo-cortical circuits during SWS, may have relevant, phasic effects on the transmission and processing of sensory information. However, brain reactivity to sensory stimuli, during SWS, has traditionally been studied by means of sequential averaging, a procedure that necessarily masks any short-term fluctuation of responsiveness. The aim of this study was to provide a dynamic evaluation of brain reactivity to sensory stimuli in naturally sleeping humans. To this aim, single-trial somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were grouped and averaged as a function of the phase of the ongoing sleep slow (<1 Hz) oscillation. This procedure revealed a dynamic profile of responsiveness, which was conditioned by the phase of the spontaneous sleep EEG. Overall, the amplitude of the evoked potential changed sistematically, increasing and approaching wakefulness levels along the negative slope of the EEG oscillation and decaying below SWS average levels along the positive drift. These marked and fast changes of stimulus-correlated electrical activity invol…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00373.2002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phase-locked electrical and transmagnetic stimulation has revealed the depolarizing up-phase as a period of distinctly enhanced neuronal network excitability.

    “Indeed, phase-locked electrical and transmagnetic stimulation has revealed the depolarizing up-phase as a period of distinctly enhanced neuronal network excitability (83,792,1200).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [792]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massimini, M., Rosanova, M., & Mariotti, M.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
1205-1213
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2113960406
Cited by
124
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
slow oscillations, slow-wave sleep, thalamocortical circuits, somatosensory evoked potentials, sleep EEG, non-stationarity, microstates
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Periodicity, Sleep, Thalamus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review