Cited by 24Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Infraslow activity as a potential modulator of corticomotor excitability

Open access
de Goede, Annika A., van Putten, Michel J. A. M.·2019·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Fluctuations in cortical excitability are a candidate mechanism involved in the trial-to-trial variation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We explore whether infraslow EEG activity (<0.1 Hz) modulates corticomotor excitability by evaluating the presence of temporal and phase clustering of TMS-induced MEPs. In addition, we evaluate the dependence of MEP amplitude on the phase of the infraslow activity. Twenty-three subjects were stimulated at an intensity above the resting motor threshold (rMT) and ten at the rMT. We evaluated whether temporal and phase clustering of MEP size and MEP generation were present, using 1,000 surrogates with a similar amplitude or occurrence distribution. To evaluate the MEP amplitude dependence, we used the least-square method to approximate the linear circular data by fitting a sine function. We observed significant temporal clustering at a group level, in all individual subjects stimulated at rMT and in the majority of those stimulated above rMT, suggesting underlying determinism of corticomotor excitability instead of randomly generated fluctuations. The majority of subjects showed significant phase clustering for MEP size and for MEP occurrence, and significant phase clustering was found at the group level. Furthermore, in approximately one-quarter to one-half of the subjects we found a significant correlation and dependence of MEP amplitude on the phase of infraslow activity, respectively. Although other mechanisms very likely contribute as well, our findings seem to suggest that infraslow activity is involved in the variability of cortical excitability and TMS-induced responses. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cortical excitability measures are highly variable during transcranial magnetic stimulation. Although ongoing brain oscillations are assumed to modulate excitability, no consistent associations are found for the traditional frequency bands. We focus on the role of infraslow EEG activity, defined as rhythms with frequencies < 0.1 Hz. We provide experimental evidence suggesting that infraslow activity most likely modulates corticomotor excitability and that response variation could be reduced when stimulation is targeted at a specific infraslow phase.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00663.2018

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bragin A, Engel J Jr, Wilson CL, Fried I, Buzsáki G. High-frequency oscillations in human brain. Hippocampus 9: 137-142, 1999. doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:2Ͻ137:AID-HIPO5Ͼ3.0.CO;2-0. · DOI
  2. Kraskov A, Kreuz T, Andrzejak RG, Stögbauer H, Nadler W, Grass- berger P. Extracting phases from aperiodic signals (Preprint). ArXiv 0409382, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Goede, A. A., & van Putten, M. J. A. M.
Affiliations
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
325-335
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2946219190
Cited by
24
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Dutch TWIN foundation for neuromodulation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
corticomotor excitability, motor evoked potentials, trial-to-trial variability, phase clustering, temporal clustering, resting motor threshold, transcranial magnetic stimulation, cortical oscillations, MEP amplitude
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Reaction Time, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review