Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motor Adaptation as a Greedy Optimization of Error and Effort

Emken, Jeremy L., Benitez, Raul, Sideris, Athanasios, Bobrow, James E., Reinkensmeyer, David J.·2007·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Motor adaptation to a novel dynamic environment is primarily thought of as a process in which the nervous system learns to anticipate the environmental forces to eliminate kinematic error. Here we show that motor adaptation can more generally be modeled as a process in which the motor system greedily minimizes a cost function that is the weighted sum of kinematic error and effort. The learning dynamics predicted by this minimization process are a linear, auto-regressive equation with only one state, which has been identified previously as providing a good fit to data from force-field-type experiments. Thus we provide a new theoretical result that shows how these previously identified learning dynamics can be viewed as arising from an optimization of error and effort. We also show that the coefficients of the learning dynamics must fall within a specific range for the optimization model to be valid and verify with experimental data from walking in a force field that they indeed fall in this range. Finally, we attempted to falsify the model by performing experiments in two conditions (repeated exposure to a force field, exposure to force fields of different strengths) for which the single-state, auto-regressive equation might be expected to not fit the data well. We found however that the equation adequately captured the pattern of errors and thus conclude that motor adaptation to a force field can be approximated as an optimization of effort and error for a range of experimental conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.01095.2006

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1115/1.1392310 · DOI
  2. Bays PM , Wolpert DM . Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol 387–396, 2007. · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/382252a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-04.2004 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/jn.1980.44.4.773 · DOI
  6. 10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.554 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11625 · DOI
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09032.2003 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843173 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/TRO.2005.861481 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3843 · DOI
  12. 10.1139/y95-038 · DOI
  13. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-21-08965.1998 · DOI
  14. 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1825 · DOI
  15. Griffin TM , Kram R . Penguin waddling is not wasteful. Nature 408 :929, 2000. · DOI
  16. Haykin SS . Adaptive Filter Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-11-02745.1984 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF00364149 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90008-V · DOI
  20. 10.1152/jn.1998.80.2.546 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s00221-003-1584-4 · DOI
  22. Liu J , Reinkensmeyer DJ . Motor Adaptation as an optimal combination of computational strategies. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , San Francisco, CA , 2004, p. 4025–4028. · DOI
  23. Montgomery DC , Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley, 2001.
  24. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2140 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/s002210100880 · DOI
  26. 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.971 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.853 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00409.1997 · DOI
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-20-07807.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-03208.1994 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00140.2005 · DOI
  32. 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.1047 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/35037588 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1007/BF00204593 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0168-0102(03)00094-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Emken, J. L., Benitez, R., Sideris, A., Bobrow, J. E., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2007-06
Volume
97
Issue
6
Pages
3997-4006
ISSN
  • 0022-3077
  • 1522-1598
Cited by
256
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review