Cited by 1,113Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning

Open access
Smith, Maurice A, Ghazizadeh, Ali, Shadmehr, Reza·2006·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Multiple processes may contribute to motor skill acquisition, but it is thought that many of these processes require sleep or the passage of long periods of time ranging from several hours to many days or weeks. Here we demonstrate that within a timescale of minutes, two distinct fast-acting processes drive motor adaptation. One process responds weakly to error but retains information well, whereas the other responds strongly but has poor retention. This two-state learning system makes the surprising prediction of spontaneous recovery (or adaptation rebound) if error feedback is clamped at zero following an adaptation-extinction training episode. We used a novel paradigm to experimentally confirm this prediction in human motor learning of reaching, and we show that the interaction between the learning processes in this simple two-state system provides a unifying explanation for several different, apparently unrelated, phenomena in motor adaptation including savings, anterograde interference, spontaneous recovery, and rapid unlearning. Our results suggest that motor adaptation depends on at least two distinct neural systems that have different sensitivity to error and retain information at different rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040179

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. A., Ghazizadeh, A., & Shadmehr, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Maurice A
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
e179
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2028612696
Cited by
1,113
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 48
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS16375, P01NS016375, NS 37422, R01NS037422, R56NS037422)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
motor learning, motor adaptation, error feedback, spontaneous recovery, savings, reaching, neural systems
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Humans, Learning, Models, Neurological, Motor Skills, Saccades, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review