The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance
Abstract
Object recognition in primates is mediated by the ventral visual pathway and is classically described as a feedforward hierarchy of increasingly sophisticated representations. Neurons in macaque monkey area V4, an intermediate stage along the ventral pathway, have been shown to exhibit selectivity to complex boundary conformation and invariance to spatial translation. How could such a representation be derived from the signals in lower visual areas such as V1? We show that a quantitative model of hierarchical processing, which is part of a larger model of object recognition in the ventral pathway, provides a plausible mechanism for the translation-invariant shape representation observed in area V4. Simulated model neurons successfully reproduce V4 selectivity and invariance through a nonlinear, translation-invariant combination of locally selective subunits, suggesting that a similar transformation may occur or culminate in area V4. Specifically, this mechanism models the selectivity of individual V4 neurons to boundary conformation stimuli, exhibits the same degree of translation invariance observed in V4, and produces observed V4 population responses to bars and non-Cartesian gratings. This work provides a quantitative model of the widely described shape selectivity and invariance properties of area V4 and points toward a possible canonical mechanism operating throughout the ventral pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
Self-citation‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90066-3 · Cited by 1,913
Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4
Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-05-01736.1999 · Cited by 1,236
Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00108-4 · Cited by 963
Self-citationLearning invariance from transformation sequences
Földiák, P. (1991) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1991.3.2.194 · Cited by 661 · cited 1×
“The invariance may also be learned in a biophysically plausible way (e.g., Foldiak 1991; Wallis 1996; Wiskott and Sejnowski 2002), during a developmental period, from natural viewing experiences , such as watching a temporal sequence of moving objects .”
Population coding of shape in area V4
Pasupathy, A., & Connor, C. E. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/972 · Cited by 552
Self-citationHow MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns
Rust, N. C., Mante, V., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1786 · Cited by 516
Cited by
How does the brain solve visual object recognition?
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,790
Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex
Yamins, D. L. K., Hong, H., Cadieu, C. F., Solomon, E. A., Seibert, D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403112111 · Cited by 1,924
Self-citationKim, S., & Lee, J. (2012) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2011.06.009 · Cited by 255
Theoretical Neuroscience Rising
Abbott, L. F. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.019 · Cited by 163
Higgins, I., Chang, L., Langston, V., Hassabis, D., Summerfield, C., Tsao, D., & Botvinick, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26751-5 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Cadieu, C., Kouh, M., Pasupathy, A., Connor, C. E., Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1733-1750
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2152172623
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.01265.2006
- The paper
- Cadieu, C., Kouh, M., Pasupathy, A., Connor, C. E., Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2007). A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01265.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.