Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Motor System Does Not Learn the Dynamics of the Arm by Rote Memorization of Past Experience

Conditt, Michael A., Gandolfo, Francesca, Mussa-Ivaldi, Ferdinando A.·1997·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Conditt, Michael A., Francesca Gandolfo, and Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 554–560, 1997. The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning mechanisms underlying motor adaptation of arm movements to externally applied perturbing forces. We considered two alternative hypotheses. According to one, adaptation occurs through the learning of a mapping between the states (positions and velocities) visited by the arm and the forces experienced at those states. The alternative hypothesis is that adaptation occurs through the memorization of the temporal sequence of forces experienced along specific trajectories. The first mechanism corresponds to developing a model of the dynamics of the environment, whereas the second is a form of “rote learning.” Both types of learning would lead to the recovery of the unperturbed performance. We have tested these hypotheses by examining how adaptation is transferred across different types of movements. Our results indicate that 1) adaptation to an externally applied force field occurs with different classes of movements including but not limited to reaching movements and 2) adaptation generalizes across different movements that visit the same regions of the external field. These findings are not compatible with the hypothesis of rote learning. Instead, they are consistent with the hypothesis that adaptation to changes in movement dynamics is achieved by a module that learns to reproduce the structure of the environmental field as an association between visited states and experienced forces, independent of the kinematics of the movements made during adaptation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.554

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Conditt, M. A., Gandolfo, F., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
554-560
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2106936397
Cited by
401
References
12
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Motor System Does Not Learn the Dynamics of the Arm by Rote Memorization of Past Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.554
The paper
Conditt, M. A., Gandolfo, F., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1997). The Motor System Does Not Learn the Dynamics of the Arm by Rote Memorization of Past Experience. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.554

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.