The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Motor System Does Not Learn the Dynamics of the Arm by Rote Memorization of Past Experience
Abstract
Conditt, Michael A., Francesca Gandolfo, and Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 554–560, 1997. The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning mechanisms underlying motor adaptation of arm movements to externally applied perturbing forces. We considered two alternative hypotheses. According to one, adaptation occurs through the learning of a mapping between the states (positions and velocities) visited by the arm and the forces experienced at those states. The alternative hypothesis is that adaptation occurs through the memorization of the temporal sequence of forces experienced along specific trajectories. The first mechanism corresponds to developing a model of the dynamics of the environment, whereas the second is a form of “rote learning.” Both types of learning would lead to the recovery of the unperturbed performance. We have tested these hypotheses by examining how adaptation is transferred across different types of movements. Our results indicate that 1) adaptation to an externally applied force field occurs with different classes of movements including but not limited to reaching movements and 2) adaptation generalizes across different movements that visit the same regions of the external field. These findings are not compatible with the hypothesis of rote learning. Instead, they are consistent with the hypothesis that adaptation to changes in movement dynamics is achieved by a module that learns to reproduce the structure of the environmental field as an association between visited states and experienced forces, independent of the kinematics of the movements made during adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model
Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-07-01688.1985 · Cited by 4,395
A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076770 · Cited by 3,220
Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task
Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-03208.1994 · Cited by 2,612
Self-citationSpatial control of arm movements
Morasso, P. (1981) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236911 · Cited by 1,668
Movement control in skilled motor performance.
Keele, S. W. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026739 · Cited by 1,144
Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements
Atkeson, C., & Hollerbach, J. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-09-02318.1985 · Cited by 926
Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory
Lackner, J. R., & Dizio, P. (1994) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1994.72.1.299 · Cited by 776
Motor learning by field approximation.
Gandolfo, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Bizzi, E. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.9.3843 · Cited by 481
Self-citationHeld, R., & Freedman, S. J. (1963) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.142.3591.455 · Cited by 338
Load compensation in human goal-directed arm movements
Bock, O. L. (1990) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(90)90106-o · Cited by 127
Cited by
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Computational principles of movement neuroscience
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81497 · Cited by 2,122
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 · Cited by 1,416
Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives
Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35037588 · Cited by 945
Perspectives and problems in motor learning
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01773-3 · Cited by 667
Metadata
- Authors
- Conditt, M. A., Gandolfo, F., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 554-560
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2106936397
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Motor System Does Not Learn the Dynamics of the Arm by Rote Memorization of Past Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.554
- The paper
- Conditt, M. A., Gandolfo, F., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1997). The Motor System Does Not Learn the Dynamics of the Arm by Rote Memorization of Past Experience. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.