The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectro-Temporal Response Field Characterization With Dynamic Ripples in Ferret Primary Auditory Cortex
Abstract
To understand the neural representation of broadband, dynamic sounds in primary auditory cortex (AI), we characterize responses using the spectro-temporal response field (STRF). The STRF describes, predicts, and fully characterizes the linear dynamics of neurons in response to sounds with rich spectro-temporal envelopes. It is computed from the responses to elementary “ripples,” a family of sounds with drifting sinusoidal spectral envelopes. The collection of responses to all elementary ripples is the spectro-temporal transfer function. The complex spectro-temporal envelope of any broadband, dynamic sound can expressed as the linear sum of individual ripples. Previous experiments using ripples with downward drifting spectra suggested that the transfer function is separable, i.e., it is reducible into a product of purely temporal and purely spectral functions. Here we measure the responses to upward and downward drifting ripples, assuming reparability within each direction, to determine if the total bidirectional transfer function is fully separable. In general, the combined transfer function for two directions is not symmetric, and hence units in AI are not, in general, fully separable. Consequently, many AI units have complex response properties such as sensitivity to direction of motion, though most inseparable units are not strongly directionally selective. We show that for most neurons, the lack of full separability stems from differences between the upward and downward spectral cross-sections but not from the temporal cross-sections; this places strong constraints on the neural inputs of these AI units.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model of human visual-motion sensing
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000322 · Cited by 1,170
Cited by
Normalization as a canonical neural computation
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3136 · Cited by 1,906
“k m σ n + (Σk αjk I )p (Σk wjk Ik) + β (12)”
Kell, A. J. E., Yamins, D. L. K., Shook, E. N., Norman-Haignere, S. V., & McDermott, J. H. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.044 · Cited by 544
Automatic speech emotion recognition using modulation spectral features
Wu, S., Falk, T. H., & Chan, W.-Y. (2011) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.013 · Cited by 389
Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex
Nelken, I. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.06.005 · Cited by 223
From circuits to behavior: a bridge too far?
Carandini, M. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3043 · Cited by 187
Efficient Tensor Network Simulation of IBM’s Eagle Kicked Ising Experiment
Tindall, J., Fishman, M., Stoudenmire, E. M., & Sels, D. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010308 · Cited by 152
Inferring input nonlinearities in neural encoding models
Ahrens, M. B., Paninski, L., & Sahani, M. (2008) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/09548980701813936 · Cited by 72
Perception of Speech and Sound
Kollmeier, B., Brand, T., & Meyer, B. (2008) · Springer Handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49127-9_4 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Depireux, D. A., Simon, J. Z., Klein, D. J., & Shamma, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1220-1234
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W130921173
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.