Cited by 187Neural dynamics and brain functionUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

From circuits to behavior: a bridge too far?

Carandini, Matteo·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuroscience seeks to understand how neural circuits lead to behavior. However, the gap between circuits and behavior is too wide. An intermediate level is one of neural computations, which occur in individual neurons and populations of neurons. Some computations seem to be canonical: repeated and combined in different ways across the brain. To understand neural computations, we must record from a myriad of neurons in multiple brain regions. Understanding computation guides research in the underlying circuits and provides a language for theories of behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3043

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is very hard to infer the mapping between the behavior of a system and its lower-level properties by only looking at the lower-level properties.

    “it is very hard to infer the mapping between the behavior of a system and its lower-level properties by only looking at the lower-level properties”

    From Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias (2017) · cites this paper as Carandini, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carandini, M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Carandini, Matteo
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-03-27
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
507-509
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2061515192
Cited by
187
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
neural circuits, behavior, neural computation, population coding, single-unit recording, brain regions
MeSH terms
Behavior, Brain, Humans, Nerve Net, Neurosciences, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review