Cited by 223Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsMusic and Audio Processing

Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex

Nelken, Israel·2004·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Neuronal responses in auditory cortex show a fascinating mixture of characteristics that span the range from almost perfect copies of physical aspects of the stimuli to extremely complex context-dependent responses. Fast, highly stimulus-specific adaptation and slower plastic mechanisms work together to constantly adjust neuronal response properties to the statistics of the auditory scene. Evidence with converging implications suggests that the neuronal activity in primary auditory cortex represents sounds in terms of auditory objects rather than in terms of invariant acoustic features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2004.06.005

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain exhibits extreme anatomical specialization with distinct cell types, circuit motifs, and processing principles across regions.

    “The brain exhibits extreme anatomical specialization with distinct cell types, circuit motifs, and processing principles across regions—from the unique neuronal types of the cerebellum to the columnar organization of sensory cortices to the distinct microcircuits of the basal ganglia (Harris and Shepherd 2015; Nelken 2004).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Nelken 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelken, I.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Nelken, Israel
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
474-480
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008652561
Cited by
223
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
auditory cortex, natural sounds, context-dependent responses, stimulus-specific adaptation, neuroplasticity, complex stimuli, primary auditory cortex
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Pathways, Auditory Perception, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Afferent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review