Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sound Repetition Rate in the Human Auditory Pathway: Representations in the Waveshape and Amplitude of fMRI Activation

Harms, Michael P., Melcher, Jennifer R.·2002·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Sound repetition rate plays an important role in stream segregation, temporal pattern recognition, and the perception of successive sounds as either distinct or fused. This study was aimed at elucidating the neural coding of repetition rate and its perceptual correlates. We investigated the representations of rate in the auditory pathway of human listeners using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), an indicator of population neural activity. Stimuli were trains of noise bursts presented at rates ranging from low (1–2/s; each burst is perceptually distinct) to high (35/s; individual bursts are not distinguishable). There was a systematic change in the form of fMRI response rate-dependencies from midbrain to thalamus to cortex. In the inferior colliculus, response amplitude increased with increasing rate while response waveshape remained unchanged and sustained. In the medial geniculate body, increasing rate produced an increase in amplitude and a moderate change in waveshape at higher rates (from sustained to one showing a moderate peak just after train onset). In auditory cortex (Heschl's gyrus and the superior temporal gyrus), amplitude changed somewhat with rate, but a far more striking change occurred in response waveshape—low rates elicited a sustained response, whereas high rates elicited an unusual phasic response that included prominent peaks just after train onset and offset. The shift in cortical response waveshape from sustained to phasic with increasing rate corresponds to a perceptual shift from individually resolved bursts to fused bursts forming a continuous (but modulated) percept. Thus at high rates, a train forms a single perceptual “event,” the onset and offset of which are delimited by the on and off peaks of phasic cortical responses. While auditory cortex showed a clear, qualitative correlation between perception and response waveshape, the medial geniculate body showed less correlation (since there was less change in waveshape with rate), and the inferior colliculus showed no correlation at all. Overall, our results suggest a population neural representation of the beginning and the end of distinct perceptual events that is weak or absent in the inferior colliculus, begins to emerge in the medial geniculate body, and is robust in auditory cortex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1433

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Harms, M. P., & Melcher, J. R.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
1433-1450
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2327358055
Cited by
182
References
7
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sound Repetition Rate in the Human Auditory Pathway: Representations in the Waveshape and Amplitude of fMRI Activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1433
The paper
Harms, M. P., & Melcher, J. R. (2002). Sound Repetition Rate in the Human Auditory Pathway: Representations in the Waveshape and Amplitude of fMRI Activation. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1433

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.