Cited by 90Neuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Illusory vowels resulting from perceptual continuity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Open access
Heinrich, Antje, Carlyon, Robert P., Davis, Matthew H., Johnsrude, Ingrid S.·2008·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study the neural processing of vowels whose perception depends on the continuity illusion. Participants heard sequences of two-formant vowels under a number of listening conditions. In the "vowel conditions," both formants were always present simultaneously and the stimuli were perceived as speech-like. Contrasted with a range of nonspeech sounds, these vowels elicited activity in the posterior middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and superior temporal sulcus (STS). When the two formants alternated in time, the "speech-likeness" of the sounds was reduced. It could be partially restored by filling the silent gaps in each formant with bands of noise (the "Illusion" condition) because the noise induced an illusion of continuity in each formant region, causing the two formants to be perceived as simultaneous. However, this manipulation was only effective at low formant-to-noise ratios (FNRs). When the FNR was increased, the illusion broke down (the "illusion-break" condition). Activation in vowel-sensitive regions of the MTG was greater in the illusion than in the illusion-break condition, consistent with the perception of Illusion stimuli as vowels. Activity in Heschl's gyri (HG), the approximate location of the primary auditory cortex, showed the opposite pattern, and may depend instead on the number of perceptual onsets in a sound. Our results demonstrate that speech-sensitive regions of the MTG are sensitive not to the physical characteristics of the stimulus but to the perception of the stimulus as speech, and also provide an anatomically distinct, objective physiological correlate of the continuity illusion in human listeners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2008.20069

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidenceintervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
  2. Wells, J. C. (1962). A study of the formants of the pure vowels of British English . Unpublished MA thesis.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinrich, A., Carlyon, R. P., Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
1737-1752
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2136513807
Cited by
90
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 36 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (69046)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
vowel perception, auditory perception, posterior middle temporal gyrus, superior temporal sulcus, speech perception, primary auditory cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Pathways, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Illusions, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Psychoacoustics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review