Cited by 148Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 268 of the 271 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Framing Spatial Cognition: Neural Representations of Proximal and Distal Frames of Reference and Their Roles in Navigation

Open access
Knierim, James J., Hamilton, Derek A.·2011·Physiological Reviews

Abstract

The most common behavioral test of hippocampus-dependent, spatial learning and memory is the Morris water task, and the most commonly studied behavioral correlate of hippocampal neurons is the spatial specificity of place cells. Despite decades of intensive research, it is not completely understood how animals solve the water task and how place cells generate their spatially specific firing fields. Based on early work, it has become the accepted wisdom in the general neuroscience community that distal spatial cues are the primary sources of information used by animals to solve the water task (and similar spatial tasks) and by place cells to generate their spatial specificity. More recent research, along with earlier studies that were overshadowed by the emphasis on distal cues, put this common view into question by demonstrating primary influences of local cues and local boundaries on spatial behavior and place-cell firing. This paper first reviews the historical underpinnings of the "standard" view from a behavioral perspective, and then reviews newer results demonstrating that an animal's behavior in such spatial tasks is more strongly controlled by a local-apparatus frame of reference than by distal landmarks. The paper then reviews similar findings from the literature on the neurophysiological correlates of place cells and other spatially correlated cells from related brain areas. A model is proposed by which distal cues primarily set the orientation of the animal's internal spatial coordinate system, via the head direction cell system, whereas local cues and apparatus boundaries primarily set the translation and scale of that coordinate system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.00021.2010

Cites

268 of 268 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 271 references

3 of the 271 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1037/0735-7044.108.2.308 · DOI
  2. Biegler R, 1996, Q J Exp Psychol B, 49, 307
  3. 10.1037/0735-7044.110.4.643 · DOI
  4. Carr H, 1917, J Anim Behav, 7, 259
  5. Clark BJ, 2010, Hippocampus
  6. Dashiell JF, 1930, Comp Psychol Monogr, 7, 1
  7. Dennis W, 1929, Pedagog Semin J Genet Psychol, 36, 59
  8. Deshmukh S, Proceedings of the 2008 Society for Neuroscience Meeting, planner program no. 90.5
  9. 10.1037/0735-7044.111.1.3 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0735-7044.109.1.49 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0735-7044.107.3.434 · DOI
  12. Honzik CH, 1933, Univ Calif Publ Psychol, 6, 99
  13. Honzik CH, 1936, Comp Psychol Monogr, 13, 113
  14. Hubbert HB, 1917, J Anim Behav, 7, 130
  15. Knierim JJ, 2004, Head Direction Cells and the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Directional Orientation
  16. 10.1023/A:1011477931753 · DOI
  17. Nadel L, 1985, Context and Learning
  18. Olton DS, 1981, Exp Brain Res, 41, 380
  19. Peterson J, 1917, J Anim Behav, 7, 338
  20. Rettenmaier BB, 1999, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 25, 1380
  21. 10.1037/0097-7403.23.1.110 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/0735-7044.107.1.34 · DOI
  23. Skaggs WE, 1995, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 7, 173
  24. Stackman RW, 1996, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 22, 1873
  25. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:6<613::AID-HIPO4>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  26. Tolman EC, 1948, Psychol Bull, 55, 189
  27. Weisand MP, 1995, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 21, 1939
  28. Yoganarasimha D, 2010, Hippocampus.
  29. 10.1037/0735-7044.99.5.1006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–148 of 148

Metadata

Authors
Knierim, J. J., & Hamilton, D. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Knierim, James J.
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Published
2011-10
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
1245-1279
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
OpenAlex
W2151688688
Cited by
148
References
271
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA015356, AA-015356, R01AA019462, AA019462)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS039456, NS-039456)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
spatial cognition, reference frames, place cells, hippocampus, spatial learning and memory, Morris water task, head direction cells, spatial navigation, local boundaries, spatial coordinate system
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Cues, Hippocampus, Learning, Orientation, Spatial Behavior, Models, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review