The DOI matches its Crossref record; 268 of the 271 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Framing Spatial Cognition: Neural Representations of Proximal and Distal Frames of Reference and Their Roles in Navigation
Open accessAbstract
The most common behavioral test of hippocampus-dependent, spatial learning and memory is the Morris water task, and the most commonly studied behavioral correlate of hippocampal neurons is the spatial specificity of place cells. Despite decades of intensive research, it is not completely understood how animals solve the water task and how place cells generate their spatially specific firing fields. Based on early work, it has become the accepted wisdom in the general neuroscience community that distal spatial cues are the primary sources of information used by animals to solve the water task (and similar spatial tasks) and by place cells to generate their spatial specificity. More recent research, along with earlier studies that were overshadowed by the emphasis on distal cues, put this common view into question by demonstrating primary influences of local cues and local boundaries on spatial behavior and place-cell firing. This paper first reviews the historical underpinnings of the "standard" view from a behavioral perspective, and then reviews newer results demonstrating that an animal's behavior in such spatial tasks is more strongly controlled by a local-apparatus frame of reference than by distal landmarks. The paper then reviews similar findings from the literature on the neurophysiological correlates of place cells and other spatially correlated cells from related brain areas. A model is proposed by which distal cues primarily set the orientation of the animal's internal spatial coordinate system, via the head direction cell system, whereas local cues and apparatus boundaries primarily set the translation and scale of that coordinate system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Such hypothetical memory representations presumably encode the spatial relationships between all the known places and landmarks in a common allocentric reference frame or unitary global map, accessible as a whole, and that can operate to infer the spatial relationships between any of the represented elements.”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Some of these spatial strategies necessarily involve complex learning and memory capabilities and require the concurrence of flexible representational mechanisms, the most remarkable of which probably is allocentric navigation based on map-like spatial memory”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The hippocampus of tetrapods seems to be essential in tasks requiring the formation of a memory of the spatial relationships of multiple elements and cues of the environment and those demanding the flexible expression of previously acquired spatial knowledge [72,73,75,76].”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat
Morris, R. (1984) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4 · Cited by 7,180
Cognitive maps in rats and men
Tolman, E. C. (1948) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0061626 · Cited by 6,641
Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions
Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., & O'Keefe, J. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/297681a0 · Cited by 6,340
The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat
O'Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1 · Cited by 6,151
The hippocampus as a cognitive map
Passingham, R. E. (1979) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(79)90015-0 · Cited by 5,128
Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex
Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03721 · Cited by 4,068
Henry, M. A. (1995) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0108 · Cited by 3,454
Simple memory: a theory for archicortex
Marr, D. (1971) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1971.0078 · Cited by 2,771
Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues
Morris, R. G. M. (1981) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/0023-9690(81)90020-5 · Cited by 2,699
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 271 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1037/0735-7044.108.2.308 · DOI
- Biegler R, 1996, Q J Exp Psychol B, 49, 307
- 10.1037/0735-7044.110.4.643 · DOI
- Carr H, 1917, J Anim Behav, 7, 259
- Clark BJ, 2010, Hippocampus
- Dashiell JF, 1930, Comp Psychol Monogr, 7, 1
- Dennis W, 1929, Pedagog Semin J Genet Psychol, 36, 59
- Deshmukh S, Proceedings of the 2008 Society for Neuroscience Meeting, planner program no. 90.5
- 10.1037/0735-7044.111.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7044.109.1.49 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7044.107.3.434 · DOI
- Honzik CH, 1933, Univ Calif Publ Psychol, 6, 99
- Honzik CH, 1936, Comp Psychol Monogr, 13, 113
- Hubbert HB, 1917, J Anim Behav, 7, 130
- Knierim JJ, 2004, Head Direction Cells and the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Directional Orientation
- 10.1023/A:1011477931753 · DOI
- Nadel L, 1985, Context and Learning
- Olton DS, 1981, Exp Brain Res, 41, 380
- Peterson J, 1917, J Anim Behav, 7, 338
- Rettenmaier BB, 1999, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 25, 1380
- 10.1037/0097-7403.23.1.110 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7044.107.1.34 · DOI
- Skaggs WE, 1995, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 7, 173
- Stackman RW, 1996, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 22, 1873
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:6<613::AID-HIPO4>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
- Tolman EC, 1948, Psychol Bull, 55, 189
- Weisand MP, 1995, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 21, 1939
- Yoganarasimha D, 2010, Hippocampus.
- 10.1037/0735-7044.99.5.1006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond
Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B., & Spiers, H. J. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4656 · Cited by 921
Representation of Non-Spatial and Spatial Information in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Deshmukh, S. S., & Knierim, J. J. (2011) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00069 · Cited by 475
Self-citationKnierim, J. J. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.049 · Cited by 535
Self-citationKnierim, J. J., Neunuebel, J. P., & Deshmukh, S. S. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0369 · Cited by 425
Self-citationSublayer-Specific Coding Dynamics during Spatial Navigation and Learning in Hippocampal Area CA1
Danielson, N. B., Zaremba, J. D., Kaifosh, P., Bowler, J., Ladow, M., & Losonczy, A. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.020 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Knierim, J. J., & Hamilton, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Knierim, James J.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1245-1279
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- PMC
- PMC3251945
- OpenAlex
- W2151688688
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 271
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Physiological Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA015356, AA-015356, R01AA019462, AA019462)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS039456, NS-039456)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- spatial cognition, reference frames, place cells, hippocampus, spatial learning and memory, Morris water task, head direction cells, spatial navigation, local boundaries, spatial coordinate system
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Cues, Hippocampus, Learning, Orientation, Spatial Behavior, Models, Animal, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
