Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-term control of arterial blood pressure

Cowley, A. W.·1992·Physiological Reviews

Abstract

Two concepts for the long-term regulation of arterial pressure were considered in this review, the neural control hypothesis and the volume regulation hypothesis. The role of the nervous system and fluid volume regulation are intertwined in a way that has made it difficult to experimentally evaluate their separate contributions in the long-term regulation of arterial pressure. Nevertheless, from a substantial body of work related to the neural control of cardiovascular function, it appears that the ability of the nervous system to control arterial pressure is limited to the detection and correction of rapid short-term changes of arterial pressure. A long and exhaustive search has yet yielded no new neural mechanisms beyond the classic sinoaortic baroreceptors that can detect changes of arterial pressure. The baroreceptor mechanisms are of great importance for the moment-to-moment stabilization of arterial pressure, but because they do not possess sufficient strength and because they reset in time to the prevailing level of arterial pressure, they cannot provide a sustained negative feedback signal to provide long-term regulation of arterial pressure in face of sustained stimuli. This is not to say that the nervous system cannot affect the long-term level of arterial pressure. A distinction is made here between the many factors that can influence the long-term level of pressure and those that actually serve to detect changes of pressure and serve to maintain the level of pressure within a narrow range over the period of our adult lifetime. In this sense, there is evidence that in genetically susceptible individuals, environmental stresses can influence the long-term level of arterial pressure via the central and peripheral neural autonomic pathways. It is inappropriate, however, to view the nervous system as a long-term controller of arterial pressure because there is yet no evidence that the CNS can detect changes of arterial pressure nor changes in total body sodium and water content over sustained periods whereby it could provide an adequate long-term normalization of such error signals. In contrast, evidence has grown in support of the renal pressure-diuresis volume regulation hypothesis for the long-term control of arterial pressure over the past decade. An enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of pressure diuresis-natriuresis coupled with studies exploring how changes of vascular volume can influence vascular smooth muscle tone provide a compelling basis for this hypothesis of long-term arterial pressure regulation. This overall concept is represented and summarized in Figure 12.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.1.231

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Cowley, A. W.
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Published
1992-01-01
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
231-300
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
OpenAlex
W2275546552
Cited by
599
References
0
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term control of arterial blood pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.1992.72.1.231
The paper
Cowley, A. W. (1992). Long-term control of arterial blood pressure. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1992.72.1.231

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.