Cited by 30Probiotics and Fermented FoodsNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsInfant Nutrition and Health

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Suppresses Meningitic E. coli K1 Penetration across Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells In Vitro and Protects Neonatal Rats against Experimental Hematogenous Meningitis

Open access
Huang, Sheng-He, He, Lina, Zhou, Yanhong, Wu, Chun-Hua, Jong, Ambrose·2009·International Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine prophylactic efficacy of probiotics in neonatal sepsis and meningitis caused by E. coli K1. The potential inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) on meningitic E. coli K1 infection was examined by using (i) in vitro inhibition assays with E44 (a CSF isolate from a newborn baby with E. coli meningitis), and (ii) the neonatal rat model of E. coli sepsis and meningitis. The in vitro studies demonstrated that LGG blocked E44 adhesion, invasion, and transcytosis in a dose-dependent manner. A significant reduction in the levels of pathogen colonization, E. coli bacteremia, and meningitis was observed in the LGG-treated neonatal rats, as assessed by viable cultures, compared to the levels in the control group. In conclusion, probiotic LGG strongly suppresses meningitic E. coli pathogens in vitro and in vivo. The results support the use of probiotic strains such as LGG for prophylaxis of neonatal sepsis and meningitis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2009/647862

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caco-2 cells resemble mature enterocyte cells in the small intestine of humans and form crypts, forming a homogeneous typical epithelial monolayer.

    “These cells resemble mature enterocyte cells in the small intestine of humans and form crypts, forming a homogeneous typical epithelial monolayer [43-45].”

    From Probiotic and Antifungal Attributes of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolates from Naturally Fermented Brazilian Table Olives (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Discussion (page not provided) describes Caco-2 cells as a model for small-intestinal epithelial differentiation and says they form a polarized monolayer after differentiation. Section 2.2 (page not provided) likewise describes differentiated monolayers with dome formation. Neither passage says the cells form crypts or that the monolayer is homogeneous; dome formation is not described as crypt formation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Huang S-H Chen YH Zhang SX Shen YF E. coli invasion of the blood-brain barrier Advances in Medical Molecular Biology 1999 2 Beijing, China Verlag Heidelberg: China Higher Education Press and Springer 114 136
  2. [33]Pietzak MM Badger J Huang S-H Thomas DW Shimada H Kim KS Inderlied C. Escherichia coli K1 IbeA is required for efficient intestinal epithelial invasion in vitro and in vivo in neonatal rats Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2001 33 p. 400

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, S.-H., He, L., Zhou, Y., Wu, C.-H., & Jong, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Department of Pediatrics, The Saban Research Institute of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
Corresponding author
Huang, Sheng-He
Venue
International Journal of Microbiology
Published
2009
Volume
2009
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 1687-918X (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-9198
OpenAlex
W2002568542
Cited by
30
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
United States Public Health Service (R21AT003207, R01-AI40635, R01 NS047599)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, probiotics, Escherichia coli K1, meningitis, neonatal sepsis, intestinal epithelial cells, bacterial adhesion, bacterial invasion, transcytosis, bacteremia, neonatal rat model, prophylaxis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review