Different Types of Resistant Starch Elicit Different Glucose Reponses in Humans
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether different types of resistant starch (RS) elicited different glycemic responses. Eleven healthy subjects consumed solutions containing 30 g of either dextrose (DEX), resistant starch type 2 (RS2), or cross-linked resistant wheat starch type 4 () on three separate occasions, which were assigned randomly. Finger stick blood samples were collected before and over the following two hours and measured for glucose. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for the glucose response was calculated for all trials. The two types of resistant starch significantly () decreased iAUC compared with DEX. The response with was significantly decreased compared with the RS2 trial. These data demonstrate that different types of resistant starch elicit significantly different glycemic responses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [1]Brown IL McNaught KJ Andrews D Morita T McCleary BV Prosky L Resistant Starch: plant breeding, applications, development and commercial uses Advanced Dietary Fibre Technology 2001 Ames, Iowa, USA Iowa State University Press, Blackwell Science
- [2]Englyst KN Liu S Englyst HN Nutritional characterization and measurement of dietary carbohydrates European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007 61 supplement 1 S19 S39 17992185
- [3]Higgins JA Higbee DR Donahoo WT Brown IL Bell ML Bessesen DH Resistant starch consumption promotes lipid oxidation Nutrition and Metabolism 2004 1, article 8 PMC526391 15507129
- [4]Jenkins DJA Kendall CWC Resistant starches Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 2000 16 2 178 183 17024038
- [5]Nugent AP Health properties of resistant starch Nutrition Bulletin 2005 30 1 27 54
- [6]Sajilata MG Singhal RS Kulkarni PR Resistant starch—a review Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2006 5 1 1 17 33412740
- [7]Thompson DB Biliaderis CG Izydorczyk M Resistant starch Functional Food Carbohydrates 2007 Boca Raton, Fla, USA CRC Press 73 96
- [9]Shi YC Jeffcoat R McCleary BV Prosky L Structural features of resistant starch Advanced Dietary Fibre Technology 2008 Ames, Iowa, USA Iowa State University Press, Blackwell Science 430 439
- [13]Clarke JM Bird AR Topping DL Cobiac L Excretion of starch and esterified short-chain fatty acids by ileostomy subjects after the ingestion of acylated starches American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007 86 4 1146 1151 17921395
- [15]Ohkuma K Wakabayashi S McCleary BV Prosky L Fibersol-2: a soluble, non-digestible, starch-derived dietary fiber Advanced Dietary Fibre Technology 2001 Ames, Iowa, USA Iowa State University Press, Blackwell Science 509 523
- [16]Ratnayake WS Jackson DS Thermal behavior of resistant starches RS 2, RS 3, and RS 4 Journal of Food Science 2008 73 5 C356 C366 18576980
- [19]Al-tamimi EK Seib PA Snyder BS Haub MD Consumption of cross-linked resistant starch (RS4XL) on glucose and insulin responses in humans Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2010 2010 6 pages Article ID 651063. PMC2925102 20798767
- [20]Robertson MD Bickerton AS Dennis AL Vidal H Frayn KN Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005 82 3 559 567 16155268
- [22]Nilsson AC Ostman EM Holst JJ Bjorck IME Including indigestible carbohydrates in the evening meal of healthy subjects improves glucose tolerance, lowers inflammatory markers, and increases satiety after a subsequent standardized breakfast Journal of Nutrition 2008 138 4 732 739 18356328
- [23]Reader DM O’Connell BS Johnson ML Franz M Glycemic and insulinemic response of subjects with type 2 diabetes after consumption of three energy bars Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2002 102 8 1139 1142 12171462
- [24]Robertson MD Currie JM Morgan LM Jewell DP Frayn KN Prior short-term consumption of resistant starch enhances postprandial insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects Diabetologia 2003 46 5 659 665 12712245
- [25]Yamada Y Hosoya S Nishimura S Effect of bread containing resistant starch on postprandial blood glucose levels in humans Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 2005 69 3 559 566 15784985
- [26]Le Leu RK Hu Y Brown IL Young GP Effect of high amylose maize starches on colonic fermentation and apoptotic response to DNA-damage in the colon of rats Nutrition and Metabolism 2009 6, article 11 PMC2656505 19267935
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cryan, J. F., O'Riordan, K. J., Cowan, C. S. M., Sandhu, K. V., Bastiaanssen, T. F. S., Boehme, M., Codagnone, M. G., Cussotto, S., Fulling, C., Golubeva, A. V., et al. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2018 · Cited by 5,286 · see citing works
Dietary fibre modulates the gut microbiota
Cronin, P., Joyce, S. A., O’Toole, P. W., & O’Connor, E. M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13051655 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Novel trends in development of dietary fiber rich meat products—a critical review
Mehta, N., Ahlawat, S. S., Sharma, D. P., & Dabur, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-013-1010-2 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Is butyrate the link between diet, intestinal microbiota and obesity-related metabolic diseases?
Brahe, L. K., Astrup, A., & Larsen, L. H. (2013) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12068 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Stewart, M., Wilcox, M., Bell, M., Buggia, M., & Maki, K. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10020129 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haub, M. D., Hubach, K. L., Al-tamimi, E. K., Ornelas, S., & Seib, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Human Metabolism Laboratory, Department of Human Nutrition, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
- Corresponding author
- Haub, Mark D.
- Venue
- Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 2010
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 2090-0724 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-0732
- PMC
- PMC2911581
- OpenAlex
- W1980383860
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- American Heart Association (0560026Z, KS347)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (0560026Z, KS347)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
- Keywords
- resistant starch, resistant starch type 4, glycemic response, incremental area under the curve, D-glucose, blood glucose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
