Cited by 253Physical Activity and HealthAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity Are Independent Predictors of Successful Aging in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Open access
Dogra, Shilpa, Stathokostas, Liza·2012·Journal of Aging Research

Abstract

Background . Sedentary behavior is emerging as an important risk factor for poor health. Physical activity has proven to be important in determining overall successful aging (SA) among older adults; however, no data exists on the influence of sedentary behavior on SA. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether there is an association between sedentary behavior and successful aging, independent of physical activity levels. Methods . 9,478 older ( M = 4,245; F = 5,233) and 10,060 middle-aged ( M = 4.621; F = 5,439) adults from the Healthy Aging cycle of the Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted with SA and its three components as outcomes while physical activity and sedentary behavior were entered as main exposures. Results . Among older adults, compared to those who were sedentary (4 hours or more/day), those who were moderately (2–4 hours/day) and least sedentary (<2 hours/day) were 38% (OR: 1.38; CI: 1.12–1.69) and 43% (OR: 1.43; CI: 1.23–1.67) more likely to age successfully, respectively. Among middle-aged adults, those who were least sedentary were 43% (OR: 1.43; CI: 1.25–1.63) more likely to age successfully. Conclusions . These novel findings suggest that sedentary activities are significantly associated with lower odds of SA among middle-aged and older adults, potentially in a dose-dependent manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2012/190654

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sedentary behavior is an independent health risk factor, separate from lack of physical activity, and is associated with successful aging, morbidity and mortality.

    “Recently, an emergence of research in sedentary behavior (SB) has indicated that SB is an independent health risk factor, separate to lack of PA, associated with successful aging, morbidity and mortality [2,3,4].”
  • The meta-prevalence of sitting was obtained for a total population of 372,550 compiled from seven surveys covering six countries (Australia, Canada, Norway, Spain, UK and USA).

    “These results were obtained for a total population of 372,550 compiled from seven surveys covering six countries (Australia, Canada, Norway, Spain, UK and USA) [3,17,18,24,25,27,33].”
  • There is little difference in sedentary behavior report by gender, with a mean difference of 1.6 ± 1.6%.

    “It would appear there is little difference in report by gender (1.6 ± 1.6%) [3,17,18].”
  • On average, 61.5% of females reported more than 4 h of sitting, compared with 63.5% of males.

    “On average 61.5% females reported more than 4 h of sitting compared to males at 63.5% [3,17,18].”
  • Those individuals who are less sedentary tend to age more successfully and report better quality of life.

    “Those individuals who are less sedentary tend to age more successfully and report better quality of life [3,25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dogra, S., & Stathokostas, L.
Affiliations
  • Acadia University (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Dogra, Shilpa
Venue
Journal of Aging Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012
Volume
2012
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 2090-2204 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-2212
OpenAlex
W2020651243
Cited by
252
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 6
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Aging Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
sedentary behavior, physical activity, successful aging, middle-aged adults, older adults, dose-response relationship, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review