Cited by 5Diaspora, migration, transnational identityMigration and Labor DynamicsRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

No longer sojourners: The complexities of racial, ethnic identity, gender, and generational outcomes for Sub-Saharan Africans in the USA

Open access
Rivers, Natasha M.·2012·International Journal of Population Research

Abstract

Through individual and group testimonies from newly arrived, 1.5 and second generation sub-Saharan Africans (For this study sub-Saharan African refers to the countries located under Northern African countries, for example, Egypt and Morocco and, includes South Africa. There are over 50 countries represented by this region; however, the most populous groups from this region in Africa in the USA are Nigerian, Ethiopian, Kenyan, Liberian, Ghanaian, Cape Verdean, South African, and Somalian.), the diversity and complexity linked to their migration and integration experiences in the USA reveal that there is a gendered and generational element to their self identity. These elements are compounded by perceptions of being African American in a racialized society and deciding whether or not to stay connected to Africa, a continent that needs their financial, political, and social resources accumulated in the USA These “new” African Americans expand the definition of blackness in the USA. Many have created a transnational relationship to Africa and the USA, which provides important implications for Africa’s potential “brain gain” as well as socioeconomic, infrastructural, and political development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2012/973745

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have pointed out bicultural tendencies of Black immigrants as against the somewhat monocultural base of African Americans.

    “Several studies, including Joseph and Hunter (2011), Mwangi and English (2017), Rivers (2012), and Doucet (2005), among others, have pointed out the bicultural tendencies of Black immigrants as against the somewhat monocultural base of the African American.”

    From Conceptualizing the Differences in the Perception and Internalization of Racism Between Black African Immigrants and African Americans in the United States (2025) · cites this paper as Rivers (2012)

    In §6.1, “Identity Formation,” Rivers reports that some African immigrants identify as both African and American, supporting the claim about bicultural tendencies. But the same section says newly arriving immigrants often did not closely identify with American culture, and the paper does not establish that African Americans have a monocultural base. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 2007, The new African diaspora in North America: policy implications
  2. 2005, African Business, 38, 309
  3. 2007, Thinking through identities: black peoples, race labels, and ethnic consciousness
  4. 2007, English language acquisition and some pedagogical issues affecting the adaptation of african children
  5. 2008, African immigrants families and the American educational system
  6. 2000, Sociological Forum, 15, 225, 10.1023/A:1007517407493 · DOI
  7. 1992, Social Science Quarterly, 73, 931
  8. 1994, International Migration Review, 28, 795, 10.1177/019791839402800408 · DOI
  9. 2009, Globalization and Ghanaian immigrant trajectories to Cincinnati: who benefits?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rivers, N. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Rivers, Natasha M.
Venue
International Journal of Population Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-14
Volume
2012
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 2090-4029 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-4037
OpenAlex
W2041365199
Cited by
5
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Population Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
sub-Saharan African migrants, ethnic-racial identity, gender, transnationalism, African American identity, Blackness, brain gain, migration and integration, immigrant children, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Kenya, Liberia, Ghana, Cape Verde, South Africa, Somalia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review