Cited by 143Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryPhysical Activity and HealthAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Physical Activity after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Field, Matthew J., Gebruers, Nick, Shanmuga Sundaram, Thavapriya, Nicholson, Sarah, Mead, Gillian·2013·ISRN Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose. Physical activity is beneficial after stroke, but it is unclear how active stroke survivors are. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine levels of activity and factors predicting activity. Summary of Review: Methods. MEDLINE (1946 to present) and EMBASE (1980 to present) were systematically searched until July 2012. All studies quantifying whole-body-free living physical activity by objective and self-reported methods in a community dwelling population with stroke were included. A random effect meta-analysis was performed. Results. Twenty-six studies were included ( n=1105 ), of which eleven ( n=315 ) contained sufficient data for meta-analysis. There were heterogeneous designs, measurements, and procedures. The studies generally recruited small samples of high-functioning participants. Level of physical activity was generally low in quantity, duration and intensity. Poorer walking ability, specific sensorimotor functions, and low mood were correlates of low physical activity. Meta-analysis generated an estimate of 4355.2 steps/day (95% CI: 3210.4 to 5499.9) with no significant heterogeneity ( I2 = 0). Conclusions. In high-functioning stroke survivors, physical activity including walking was generally low. Strategies are needed to promote and maintain physical activity in stroke survivors. Research is needed to establish reasons for low physical activity after stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2013/464176

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the studies included in Physical Activity after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis recruited exclusively non-ambulatory patients.

    “Moreover, none of the studies included in Physical Activity after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis recruited exclusively non-ambulatory patients [15].”

    From Physical Activity, Psychological and Functional Outcomes in Non-Ambulatory Stroke Patients during Rehabilitation—A Pilot Study (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    Section 3.1 (page not specified) says that all but four of the 26 included studies recruited ambulatory participants. It does not establish whether any of the four exceptions recruited exclusively non-ambulatory patients, so the claim about every included study goes beyond what our copy confirms. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. E. Haeuber, M. Shaughnessy, L. W. Forrester, K. L. Coleman, and R. F. Macko, "Accelerometer monitoring of home-and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke, " Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 1997- 2001, 2004.
  2. P. J. Manns and E. Baldwin, "Ambulatory activity of stroke sur- vivors measurement options for dose, intensity, and variability of activity, " Stroke, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 864-867, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Field, M. J., Gebruers, N., Shanmuga Sundaram, T., Nicholson, S., & Mead, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh, Room S1642, Royal Infirmary, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret University Drive, Musselburgh EH21 6UU, UK
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Mead, Gillian
Venue
ISRN Stroke
Published
2013-11-07
Volume
2013
Pages
1-13
ISSN
2090-9454 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044166982
Cited by
143
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ISRN Stroke (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Heart Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
physical activity, stroke survivors, walking, step count, physical activity level, walking ability, sensorimotor function, depressive mood, predictors of physical activity, community-dwelling stroke survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review