The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization and Optimization of Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Manufactured by the Fused Deposition Modelling Process
Open accessAbstract
While fused deposition modelling (FDM) is one of the most used additive manufacturing (AM) techniques today due to its ability to manufacture very complex geometries, the major research issues have been to balance ability to produce aesthetically appealing looking products with functionality. In this study, five important process parameters such as layer thickness, part orientation, raster angle, raster width, and air gap have been considered to study their effects on tensile strength of test specimen, using design of experiment (DOE). Using group method of data handling (GMDH), mathematical models relating the response with the process parameters have been developed. Using differential evolution (DE), optimal process parameters have been found to achieve good strength simultaneously for the response. The optimization of the mathematical model realized results in maximized tensile strength. Consequently, the additive manufacturing part produced is improved by optimizing the process parameters. The predicted models obtained show good correlation with the measured values and can be used to generalize prediction for process conditions outside the current study. Results obtained are very promising and hence the approach presented in this paper has practical applications for design and manufacture of parts using additive manufacturing technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
Cited by
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 · Cited by 1,015
Process–Structure–Properties in Polymer Additive Manufacturing via Material Extrusion: A Review
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Tan, H. K. J., Sing, S. L., Goh, G. L., & Yeong, W. Y. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 · Cited by 429
Rashed, K., Kafi, A., Simons, R., & Bateman, S. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-10134-1 · Cited by 39
Rashed, K., Kafi, A., Simons, R., & Bateman, S. (2023) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-023-11167-w · Cited by 38
Taguchi optimization of 3D printed short carbon fiber polyetherketoneketone (CFR PEKK)
Rabinowitz, A., DeSantis, P. M., Basgul, C., Spece, H., & Kurtz, S. M. (2023) · Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105981 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Onwubolu, G. C., & Rayegani, F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-10
- Volume
- 2014
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 2314-5781 (ISSN-L)
- 2356-7023
- OpenAlex
- W2103417572
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization and Optimization of Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Manufactured by the Fused Deposition Modelling Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2014/598531
- The paper
- Onwubolu, G. C., & Rayegani, F. (2014). Characterization and Optimization of Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Manufactured by the Fused Deposition Modelling Process. International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/598531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.