Cited by 131Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringElectronic Health Records SystemsTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Information Technology in Critical Care: Review of Monitoring and Data Acquisition Systems for Patient Care and Research

Open access
De Georgia, Michael A., Kaffashi, Farhad, Jacono, Frank J., Loparo, Kenneth A.·2015·The Scientific World Journal

Abstract

There is a broad consensus that 21st century health care will require intensive use of information technology to acquire and analyze data and then manage and disseminate information extracted from the data. No area is more data intensive than the intensive care unit. While there have been major improvements in intensive care monitoring, the medical industry, for the most part, has not incorporated many of the advances in computer science, biomedical engineering, signal processing, and mathematics that many other industries have embraced. Acquiring, synchronizing, integrating, and analyzing patient data remain frustratingly difficult because of incompatibilities among monitoring equipment, proprietary limitations from industry, and the absence of standard data formatting. In this paper, we will review the history of computers in the intensive care unit along with commonly used monitoring and data acquisition systems, both those commercially available and those being developed for research purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2015/727694

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Stacy R. Peters R. Computations of respiratory mechanical parameters Computations in Biomedical Research 1965 New York, NY, USA Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Georgia, M. A., Kaffashi, F., Jacono, F. J., & Loparo, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Scientific World Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01
Volume
2015
Issue
1
Pages
727694-727694
ISSN
  • 1537-744X (ISSN-L)
  • 2356-6140
OpenAlex
W2018024530
Cited by
131
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Scientific World JOURNAL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Veterans Administration Research Service (I01BX000873)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
intensive care monitoring, health data integration, data standardization, biomedical signal processing
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Humans, Medical Informatics, Monitoring, Physiologic, Systems Integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review