Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low Autophagy (ATG) Gene Expression Is Associated with an Immature AML Blast Cell Phenotype and Can Be Restored during AML Differentiation Therapy

Jin, Jing, Britschgi, Adrian, Schläfli, Anna M., Humbert, Magali, Shan-Krauer, Deborah, Batliner, Jasmin, Federzoni, Elena A., Ernst, Marion, Torbett, Bruce E., Yousefi, Shida, Simon, Hans-Uwe, Tschan, Mario P.·2018·Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Abstract

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation system that ensures a dynamic recycling of a variety of building blocks required for self‐renewal, homeostasis, and cell survival under stress. We used primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) samples and human AML cell lines to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of autophagy and its role in AML differentiation. We found a significantly lower expression of key autophagy‐ (ATG‐) related genes in primary AML as compared to healthy granulocytes, an increased autophagic activity during all‐trans retinoic acid‐ (ATRA‐) induced neutrophil differentiation, and an impaired AML differentiation upon inhibition of ATG3, ATG4D, and ATG5. Supporting the notion of noncanonical autophagy, we found that ATRA‐induced autophagy was Beclin1‐independent compared to starvation‐ or arsenic trioxide‐ (ATO‐) induced autophagy. Furthermore, we identified PU.1 as positive transcriptional regulator of ATG3, ATG4D, and ATG5. Low PU.1 expression in AML may account for low ATG gene expression in this disease. Low expression of the autophagy initiator ULK1 in AML can partially be attributed to high expression of the ULK1‐targeting microRNA‐106a. Our data clearly suggest that granulocytic AML differentiation relies on noncanonical autophagy pathways and that restoring autophagic activity might be beneficial in differentiation therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2018/1482795

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1101/gad.1599207 · DOI
  3. 10.1089/ars.2010.3482 · DOI
  4. 10.15252/embj.201796697 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.030 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.02.011 · DOI
  7. 10.1042/bse0550051 · DOI
  8. 10.15252/embj.201490784 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41388-017-0046-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1101/gad.1545107 · DOI
  11. 10.1074/jbc.M701194200 · DOI
  12. 10.1101/gad.1565707 · DOI
  13. 10.3389/fonc.2017.00128 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.08.012 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/febs.13962 · DOI
  17. 10.1182/blood-2007-10-077396 · DOI
  18. 10.1182/blood-2007-12-077917 · DOI
  19. 10.4161/auto.5474 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/science.1154822 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nature03029 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137398 · DOI
  23. 10.4161/auto.6.3.11528 · DOI
  24. 10.1182/blood-2010-06-288589 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nri2161 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.019 · DOI
  27. 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.2554 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.10.002 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.045 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nrc2943 · DOI
  31. 10.1182/blood.V89.9.3354 · DOI
  32. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-261040 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41598-017-12734-4 · DOI
  34. 10.4161/auto.7.4.14397 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.07.056 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/cddis.2014.261 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.01.001 · DOI
  38. 10.4161/auto.5.8.9889 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1182/blood-2011-08-372383 · DOI
  40. 10.1182/blood-2011-11-392167 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/icb.2014.81 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.1413935112 · DOI
  43. 10.4161/auto.29394 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.08.024 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.06.010 · DOI
  46. 10.1182/blood-2008-05-158139 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.06.004 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.blre.2017.04.001 · DOI
  49. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029014 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/cdd.2014.169 · DOI
  51. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1102 · DOI
  52. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2608 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404198 · DOI
  54. 10.1074/jbc.M801716200 · DOI
  55. 10.1177/1078155211399163 · DOI
  56. 10.1039/b804606a · DOI
  57. 10.1189/jlb.1112608 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.08.037 · DOI
  59. 10.1189/jlb.1AB0514-258R · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 50

Metadata

Authors
Jin, J., Britschgi, A., Schläfli, A. M., Humbert, M., Shan-Krauer, D., Batliner, J., Federzoni, E. A., Ernst, M., Torbett, B. E., Yousefi, S., Simon, H.-U., & Tschan, M. P.
Venue
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01
Volume
2018
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1942-0900
  • 1942-0994
Cited by
50
References
9
Language
en
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_143739, 31003A_173219, PBBEP3_146108)
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01HL116221-01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review