Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Stains on LDL Reduction and Liver Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liang, Xiao, He, Qin, Zhao, Qinghua·2018·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Background and Aim . Statin is a class of medications used to decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level to prevent cardiovascular disease. However, the risk of hepatic damage caused by statin therapy is still controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the existing evidence of the effect of statin therapy on incidence of liver injury to clarify whether statin therapy could lead to liver function test abnormalities. Methods . We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase database for the relevant studies update till Jan. 2017 regarding statin therapy and liver injury. Two researchers screened the literature independently by the selection and exclusion criteria. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random effects models, and subgroup analyses were performed by study characteristics. This meta-analysis was performed by STATA 13.1 software. Results . Analyses were based on 74,078 individuals from 16 studies. The summary OR of statin therapy was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.01–1.39, p = 0.04 ; I 2 = 0.0 % ) for liver injury. Subgroup analysis indicated that fluvastatin increased the risk of liver injury significantly (OR, 3.50; 95% CI: 1.07–11.53, p = 0.039 ; I 2 = 0.0 % ) and dose over 40 mg/daily had an unfavorable effect on the liver damage (OR, 3.62; 95% CI: 1.52–8.65, p = 0.004 ; I 2 = 0.0 % ). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust. Conclusion . Our findings confirm that statin therapy substantially increases the risk of liver injury, especially using fluvastatin over 40 mg/d.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2018/7092414

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 1 Flowchart of study selection.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of the association between statin therapy and incidence of liver injury. The area of each square is proportional to the inverse of the variance of the log relative risks. Horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diamonds represent pooled estimates from an inverse variance-weighted random effects model. OR = odds ratio.
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of the association between statin therapy and incidence of liver injury. The area of each square is proportional to the inverse of the variance of the log relative risks. Horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diamonds represent pooled estimates from an inverse variance-weighted random effects model. OR = odds ratio.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3
Figure 3 CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Funnel plot for statin therapy and incidence of liver injury.
Figure 4 Funnel plot for statin therapy and incidence of liver injury.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67394-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.824 · DOI
  3. 10.2174/0929867023369024 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/hep.20671 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.dld.2006.04.013 · DOI
  6. 2002, Annals of Hepatology, 1, 162, 10.1016/S1665-2681(19)32160-X · DOI
  7. 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400010067008 · DOI
  8. 10.3132/dvdr.2008.029 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11600-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1592/phco.24.6.584.34738 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1136/bmj.d5928 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02949.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/sim.2380 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1758 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00346-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1001/jama.287.24.3215 · DOI
  18. 10.1001/jama.279.20.1615 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1056/NEJM199511163332001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2004.08.027 · DOI
  21. 10.1056/nejm199811053391902 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1056/nejm199610033351401 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1186/1472-6904-9-6 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.11.016 · DOI
  25. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.11.015 · DOI
  26. 10.1161/01.CIR.90.4.1679 · DOI
  27. 10.1001/jama.1990.03450020093033 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90629-7 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S1062-1458(01)00368-3 · DOI
  30. 10.2147/IBPC.S34814 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/pds.3646 · DOI
  32. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000037520.89770.5E · DOI
  33. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000032033.39301.6A · DOI
  34. 2003, Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 17, 491, 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00176.x · DOI
  35. 10.1002/hep.27157 · DOI
  36. 10.1055/s-0029-1240010 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.1059108 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1055/s-2002-30100 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s002280000225 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/hep.21848 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s40261-015-0335-1 · DOI
  42. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159512 · DOI
  43. 10.2337/diacare.7.3.248 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Liang, X., He, Q., & Zhao, Q.
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018
Volume
2018
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
Cited by
16
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review