The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaffold Techniques and Designs in Tissue Engineering Functions and Purposes: A Review
Open accessAbstract
In this review paper, the definition of the tissue engineering (TE) was comprehensively explored towards scaffold fabrication techniques and applications. Scaffold properties and features in TE, biological aspects, scaffold material composition, scaffold structural requirements, and old and current manufacturing technologies were reported and discussed. In almost all the reviewed reports, the TE definition denotes renewal, development, and repairs of damaged tissues caused by various factors such as disease, injury, or congenital disabilities. TE is multidisciplinary that combines biology, biochemistry, clinical medicine, and materials science whose application in cellular systems such as organ transplantation serves as a delivery vehicle for cells and drug. According to the previous literature and this review, the scaffold fabrication techniques can be classified into two main categories: conventional and modern techniques. These TE fabrication techniques are applied in the scaffold building which later on are used in tissue and organ structure. The benefits and drawbacks of each of the fabrication techniques have been described in conjunction with current areas of research devoted to deal with some of the challenges. To figure out, the highlighted aspects aimed to define the advancements and challenges that should be addressed in the scaffold design for tissue engineering. Additionally, this study provides an excellent review of original numerical approaches focused on mechanical characteristics that can be helpful in the scaffold design assessment in the analysis of scaffold parameters in tissue engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gauvin, R., Chen, Y.-C., Lee, J. W., Soman, P., Zorlutuna, P., Nichol, J. W., Bae, H., Chen, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048 · Cited by 641 · cited 1×
“[39] applied an equivalent method in the design of 3D scaffolds using gelatin methacrylate to obtain a specially designed scaffold with precise mechanical properties as needed.”
Method
Cited by
Is it time to start transitioning from 2D to 3D cell culture?
Jensen, C., & Teng, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00033 · Cited by 1,640
Zhang, X., Chen, X., Hong, H., Hu, R., Liu, J., & Liu, C. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014 · Cited by 680
Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles
Singh, A. P., Biswas, A., Shukla, A., & Maiti, P. (2019) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-019-0068-3 · Cited by 645
Askari, M., Afzali Naniz, M., Kouhi, M., Saberi, A., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm00973c · Cited by 369
Neishabouri, A., Soltani Khaboushan, A., Daghigh, F., Kajbafzadeh, A.-M., & Majidi Zolbin, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.805299 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Eltom, A., Zhong, G., & Muhammad, A.
- Venue
- Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-07
- Volume
- 2019
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1687-8434 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-8442
- OpenAlex
- W2921889657
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaffold Techniques and Designs in Tissue Engineering Functions and Purposes: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2019/3429527
- The paper
- Eltom, A., Zhong, G., & Muhammad, A. (2019). Scaffold Techniques and Designs in Tissue Engineering Functions and Purposes: A Review. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3429527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.