The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Additive Manufacturing Technologies: An Overview about 3D Printing Methods and Future Prospects
Open accessAbstract
The use of conventional manufacturing methods is mainly limited by the size of the production run and the geometrical complexity of the component, and as a result we are occasionally forced to use processes and tools that increase the final cost of the element being produced. Additive manufacturing techniques provide major competitive advantages due to the fact that they adapt to the geometrical complexity and customised design of the part to be manufactured. The following may also be achieved according to field of application: lighter weight products, multimaterial products, ergonomic products, efficient short production runs, fewer assembly errors and, therefore, lower associated costs, lower tool investment costs, a combination of different manufacturing processes, an optimised use of materials, and a more sustainable manufacturing process. Additive manufacturing is seen as being one of the major revolutionary industrial processes of the next few years. Additive manufacturing has several alternatives ranging from simple RepRap machines to complex fused metal deposition systems. This paper will expand upon the structural design of the machines, their history, classification, the alternatives existing today, materials used and their characteristics, the technology limitations, and also the prospects that are opening up for different technologies both in the professional field of innovation and the academic field of research. It is important to say that the choice of technology is directly dependent on the particular application being planned: first the application and then the technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences
Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403397r · Cited by 1,746
Cited by
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
3D Printing as a Promising Tool in Personalized Medicine
Vaz, V. M., & Kumar, L. (2021) · AAPS PharmSciTech · doi:10.1208/s12249-020-01905-8 · Cited by 409
Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176
Post-Production Finishing Processes Utilized in 3D Printing Technologies
Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., Petrescu, F., Ungureanu, L., & Munteanu, I. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12030595 · Cited by 80
Towards Sustainability in Hydraulic Machinery Manufacturing by 3D Printing
Remache, A., Pérez-Sánchez, M., Hidalgo, V. H., Ramos, H. M., & Sánchez-Romero, F.-J. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12122664 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiménez, M., Romero, L., Domínguez, I. A., Espinosa, M. D. M., & Domínguez, M.
- Venue
- Complexity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1076-2787 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0526
- OpenAlex
- W2915447555
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive Manufacturing Technologies: An Overview about 3D Printing Methods and Future Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2019/9656938
- The paper
- Jiménez, M., Romero, L., Domínguez, I. A., Espinosa, M. D. M., & Domínguez, M. (2019). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: An Overview about 3D Printing Methods and Future Prospects. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9656938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.